From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Dan Stromberg <strombrg@dcs.nac.uci.edu>
Cc: "Aswathanarayana, Chetan (STSD)" <chetan.aswathanarayana@hp.com>,
mehta kiran <kiranmehta1981@yahoo.com>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: lockd grace period
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 22:07:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41FEF263.2050901@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1107212871.4071.45.camel@seki.nac.uci.edu>
Dan Stromberg wrote:
>On Mon, 2005-01-31 at 09:58 -0500, Steve Dickson wrote:
>
>
>>Aswathanarayana, Chetan (STSD) wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Say, a reclaim request arrives after grace period and get's lock. There
>>>will be time frame between end of grace period and arrival of
>>>Reclaim request, in which case any thing can happen(ex: a new request
>>>could be granted, it may make some changes to a file and unlock by the
>>>time Reclaim arrives).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>Nobody is saying this NLM protocol or method of recovery is perfect....
>>;-) This
>>is one of many reasons why the locking protocol is not integrated with the
>>NFSv4 protocol...
>>
>>steved.
>>
>>
>
>I thought finally integrating locking into the protocol was supposed to
>be a "feature" of NFSv4?
>
>
My bad... s/is not/is/
steved.
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting
Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time
by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc.
Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-01 3:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-01-31 12:50 lockd grace period Aswathanarayana, Chetan (STSD)
2005-01-31 14:36 ` mehta kiran
2005-01-31 15:01 ` Steve Dickson
2005-01-31 15:09 ` mehta kiran
2005-01-31 16:01 ` Steve Dickson
2005-01-31 14:58 ` Steve Dickson
2005-01-31 15:01 ` mehta kiran
2005-01-31 23:07 ` Dan Stromberg
2005-01-31 23:57 ` Trond Myklebust
2005-02-01 3:07 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-01 10:46 mehta kiran
2005-01-31 7:41 mehta kiran
2005-01-31 12:33 ` Steve Dickson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41FEF263.2050901@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=chetan.aswathanarayana@hp.com \
--cc=kiranmehta1981@yahoo.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=strombrg@dcs.nac.uci.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox