From: Hugh Caley <hcaley@plasmabat.com>
To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Performance Difference Between Linux NFS Server and Netapp
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 13:41:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42D6CDDE.90703@plasmabat.com> (raw)
Thank you! Just the sort of thing I'm looking for ...
Hugh
>From: Chris Penney <cpenney@gmail.com>
>Reply-To: penney@msu.edu
>To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
>Subject: Re: [NFS] Performance Difference Between Linux NFS Server and Netapp
>
>
>On 7/14/05, Hugh Caley <hcaley@plasmabat.com> wrote:=20
>
>
>>>=20
>>> A valid point, of course, but I don't think I'm actually expecting a
>>> single NFSd to act like an expensive Netapp. I do think that wondering
>>> why the Netapp is twice as fast for a sequential write is a valid
>>> question, even if the OS and NFS server subsystem are free. I was kind
>>> of hoping someone would just say "you're getting what you should expect
>>> to get" or "wow, that's slow, try this and this and this".
>>
>>
>
> You referenced that you were getting 300 megabits (or 37MB/s). I have=20
>several SLES 9 nfs servers (using self compiled 2.6.11.5
><http://2.6.11.5>kernel) running on IBM x345 hardware (dual cpu pentum
>4, 2gb ram, dual
>qlogic hbas) connected to a single LSI storage array that presents four lun=
>s=20 ...
>
--
Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you. - Leviticus 11:9-12
http://godhatesshrimp.com
Hugh Caley hcaley@plasmabat.com
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next reply other threads:[~2005-07-14 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-14 20:41 Hugh Caley [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-07-11 22:55 Performance Difference Between Linux NFS Server and Netapp Hugh Caley
2005-07-12 16:24 ` Roger Heflin
2005-07-12 16:34 ` Joshua Baker-LePain
2005-07-12 18:19 ` Hugh Caley
2005-07-14 11:25 ` Sten Spans
2005-07-14 18:21 ` Hugh Caley
2005-07-14 19:50 ` Chris Penney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42D6CDDE.90703@plasmabat.com \
--to=hcaley@plasmabat.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox