From: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: "Lever, Charles" <Charles.Lever@netapp.com>,
Thomas Stockheim <tommi@bub-agema.de>,
nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: NFS problem - close to open cache consistency broken ?
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:12:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <43298F6A.9000500@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050915150824.GA24870@fieldses.org>
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 06:50:49AM -0700, Lever, Charles wrote:
>
>
>>close-to-open is a convention, not a specification, so it's really up to
>>the client developers to implement what they think is right.
>>
>>
>
>You can't turn off cache revalidation checks while someone else on the
>client has the file open. Wouldn't that would make close-to-open
>useless in a lot of cases?
>
Perhaps, but close-to-open still covers cases that the normal cache
revalidation does not. There are still windows possible with the
normal attribute cache which close-to-open handles. Some of this
depends upon the attribute cache timeouts...
ps
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by:
Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server.
Download it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very
own Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-15 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-15 13:50 NFS problem - close to open cache consistency broken ? Lever, Charles
2005-09-15 14:19 ` Peter Staubach
2005-09-15 15:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2005-09-15 15:12 ` Peter Staubach [this message]
[not found] <12528729.1126796454117.JavaMail.root@dtm1eusosrv72.dtm.ops.eu.uu.net>
2005-09-15 15:14 ` Thomas Stockheim
[not found] ` <18266122.1126803664464.JavaMail.root@dtm1eusosrv72.dtm.ops.eu.uu.net>
2005-09-16 7:22 ` Thomas Stockheim
[not found] <6063053.1126674084242.JavaMail.root@dtm1eusosrv72.dtm.ops.eu.uu.net>
2005-09-15 7:47 ` Thomas Stockheim
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-09-14 2:22 Lever, Charles
2005-09-13 9:04 Thomas Stockheim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=43298F6A.9000500@redhat.com \
--to=staubach@redhat.com \
--cc=Charles.Lever@netapp.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=tommi@bub-agema.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox