From: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@hammerspace.com>
To: "anna@kernel.org" <anna@kernel.org>,
"tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de" <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de>
Cc: "linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs4: don't map EACCESS and EPERM to EIO
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 17:53:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <437767d036ee95a7ce92d7fa2add82a441eedf78.camel@hammerspace.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AD6C85BF-50F9-42BB-83E8-16BCE03D3CF1@desy.de>
On Thu, 2023-06-08 at 19:42 +0200, Tigran Mkrtchyan wrote:
> Hi Trond,
>
> I will check and let you know. What we see is EACCESS on layoutget
> reported as EIO to the applications
>
If this is for a write, then that might just be
nfs_mapping_set_error(). In newer kernels, it tries to avoid sending
errors that are unexpected for strictly POSIX applications.
Cheers
Trond
> Best regards,
> Tigran
>
>
> On June 8, 2023 5:33:16 PM GMT+02:00, Trond Myklebust
> <trondmy@hammerspace.com> wrote:
> > Hi Tigran,
> >
> > On Thu, 2023-06-08 at 16:49 +0200, Tigran Mkrtchyan wrote:
> > > the nfs4_map_errors function converts NFS specific errors to
> > > userland
> > > errors. However, it ignores NFS4ERR_PERM and EPERM, which then
> > > get
> > > mapped to EIO.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Tigran Mkrtchyan
> > > <tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de> fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 2 ++
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> > > index d3665390c4cb..795205fe4f30 100644
> > > --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> > > +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
> > > @@ -171,12 +171,14 @@ static int nfs4_map_errors(int err)
> > > case -NFS4ERR_LAYOUTTRYLATER:
> > > case -NFS4ERR_RECALLCONFLICT:
> > > return -EREMOTEIO;
> > > + case -NFS4ERR_PERM:
> > > case -NFS4ERR_WRONGSEC:
> > > case -NFS4ERR_WRONG_CRED:
> > > return -EPERM;
> > > case -NFS4ERR_BADOWNER:
> > > case -NFS4ERR_BADNAME:
> > > return -EINVAL;
> > > + case -NFS4ERR_ACCESS:
> > > case -NFS4ERR_SHARE_DENIED:
> > > return -EACCES;
> > > case -NFS4ERR_MINOR_VERS_MISMATCH:
> > >
> >
> > Hmm... Aren't both these cases covered by the exception at the top
> > of
> > the function?
> >
> > static int nfs4_map_errors(int err)
> > {
> > if (err >= -1000)
> > return err;
> >
> > As I read it, that should mean that err = -NFS4ERR_ACCESS (= -13)
> > and
> > err = -NFS4ERR_PERM (= -1) will get returned verbatim.
> >
> > Are you seeing these NFS4ERR_ACCESS and NFS4ERR_PERM cases hitting
> > the
> > default: dprintk() when you turn it on?
> >
--
Trond Myklebust
CTO, Hammerspace Inc
1900 S Norfolk St, Suite 350 - #45
San Mateo, CA 94403
www.hammerspace.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-08 17:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-08 14:49 [PATCH] nfs4: don't map EACCESS and EPERM to EIO Tigran Mkrtchyan
2023-06-08 15:33 ` Trond Myklebust
[not found] ` <AD6C85BF-50F9-42BB-83E8-16BCE03D3CF1@desy.de>
2023-06-08 17:53 ` Trond Myklebust [this message]
2023-06-09 13:30 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
2023-06-09 14:00 ` Benjamin Coddington
2023-06-13 8:27 ` Mkrtchyan, Tigran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=437767d036ee95a7ce92d7fa2add82a441eedf78.camel@hammerspace.com \
--to=trondmy@hammerspace.com \
--cc=anna@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tigran.mkrtchyan@desy.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox