From: "Benjamin Coddington" <bcodding@redhat.com>
To: "Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
"Anna Schumaker" <anna.schumaker@netapp.com>,
"Weston Andros Adamson" <dros@primarydata.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pnfs: Fix the check for requests in range of layout segment
Date: Mon, 22 May 2017 17:30:34 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <447399F0-689F-45FB-9291-5798821B838A@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf2ea18703f605c6fcfe698f5a59c6062ca590ed.1495477047.git.bcodding@redhat.com>
On 22 May 2017, at 14:20, Benjamin Coddington wrote:
> It's possible and acceptable for NFS to attempt to add requests beyond
> the
> range of the current pgio->pg_lseg, a case which should be caught and
> limited by the pg_test operation. However, the current handling of
> this
> case replaces pgio->pg_lseg with a new layout segment (after a WARN)
> within
> that pg_test operation. That will cause all the previously added
> requests
> to be submitted with this new layout segment, which may not be valid
> for
> those requests.
>
> Fix this problem by only returning zero for the number of bytes to
> coalesce
> from pg_test for this case which allows any previously added requests
> to
> complete on the current layout segment. The check for requests
> starting
> out of range of the layout segment moves to pg_init, so that the
> replacement of pgio->pg_lseg will be done when the next request is
> added.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Coddington <bcodding@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
> fs/nfs/pnfs.h | 10 ++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index adc6ec28d4b5..0c26de3d3914 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -2094,12 +2094,28 @@ pnfs_generic_pg_check_layout(struct
> nfs_pageio_descriptor *pgio)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnfs_generic_pg_check_layout);
>
> +/*
> + * Check for any intersection between the request and the
> pgio->pg_lseg,
> + * and if none, put this pgio->pg_lseg away.
> + */
> +static void
> +pnfs_generic_pg_check_range(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *pgio,
> struct nfs_page *req)
> +{
> + if (pgio->pg_lseg && !pnfs_lseg_request_intersecting(pgio->pg_lseg,
> req)) {
> + if (pgio->pg_ops->pg_cleanup)
> + pgio->pg_ops->pg_cleanup(pgio);
> + else
> + pnfs_generic_pg_cleanup(pgio);
Actually, I think this ^^ should be put_lseg(), pgio->pg_lseg = NULL
instead, since we're already within pg_init. The layouts might have
work
that would be undone by pg_cleanup.. I'll send a v2 after a short wait
for
comment.
Ben
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-22 21:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-22 18:20 [PATCH] pnfs: Fix the check for requests in range of layout segment Benjamin Coddington
2017-05-22 21:30 ` Benjamin Coddington [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=447399F0-689F-45FB-9291-5798821B838A@redhat.com \
--to=bcodding@redhat.com \
--cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=dros@primarydata.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).