From: raini@rainiday.com
To: "Jeff Layton" <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: "Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
"Kevin Coffman" <kwc@citi.umich.edu>,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [NFS] NFS/krb and batch jobs - doable?
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2009 09:47:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4603e94d7a85c40d7252308f394bb6ba.squirrel@webmail.rainiday.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091013140306.476b20fd@tlielax.poochiereds.net>
> On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 13:51:33 -0400
> Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 13:27 -0400, Jeff Layton wrote:
>> > Correct...and gssd actually does check the validity of the cache. If
>> > TGT has expired or it's not valid for some other reason, then it skips
>> > it and moves on.
>> >
>> > The problem comes when you have more than one valid credcache. In that
>> > case it picks the one with the latest mtime. It seems that it should
>> > instead pick the one with the latest TGT expiration time.
>>
>> So why do you think that is a problem? The result should be that
>> rpc.gssd always ends up with a valid credential as long as there is at
>> least one with a valid TGT.
>> IOW: Who cares if the GSS session isn't going to last as long, as long
>> as the RPC client can always instantiate a new one.
>>
>
> Hrm...good point. I suppose that as long as gssd can pick a new
> credcache if the context expires then this patch is superfluous. Wasn't
> that support only added fairly recently (around a year ago?)? If so, it
> may just be that raini isn't using a recent enough nfs-utils...
Hm - well I'm stuck on production machines (RHEL5) so currently on
nfs-utils 1.0.9 which I'm going to take a wild guess may be problematic
either way. Could someone point me to information on this change (I see
little in http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/utils/nfs/)?
The reason I thought the new code would be useful is that if default
tickets are non-renewable and short lifetime, it seems sensible for gssd
to spot and use a longer lifetime renewable ticket in another ccache file
- and say use krenew to keep the job alive (or even cope with the user
renewing the ticket manually).
Seems to me therefore that in the absence of per-session ccaches, gssd
should prefer long lifetime, and renewable.
Would the newer code you mention cope with this situation already?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-14 16:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-09 15:15 [NFS] NFS/krb and batch jobs - doable? raini-9HxftnAiGddWk0Htik3J/w
[not found] ` <c8e974302190b867ad8ea49d8158f1db.squirrel-2RFepEojUI30fF+2cCIZ11aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-09 16:16 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20091009121602.5ec86dfb-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-09 16:53 ` raini-9HxftnAiGddWk0Htik3J/w
[not found] ` <1c358fde92c49215d84129a1bfe2c6ec.squirrel-2RFepEojUI30fF+2cCIZ11aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-10 13:00 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20091010090039.4dfd1dfb-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-13 15:28 ` raini-9HxftnAiGddWk0Htik3J/w
[not found] ` <ee56329e7d86a3e4b15001a39bb7e14a.squirrel-2RFepEojUI30fF+2cCIZ11aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-13 15:44 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20091013114441.2882c8b9-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-13 15:51 ` Kevin Coffman
2009-10-13 16:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-10-13 17:27 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20091013132701.72927b4d-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-13 17:51 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-10-13 18:03 ` Jeff Layton
2009-10-14 16:47 ` raini [this message]
2009-10-14 17:12 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-10-14 18:19 ` Kevin Coffman
2009-10-13 15:59 ` raini
2009-10-13 17:31 ` Jeff Layton
2009-10-13 17:52 ` Jeff Layton
2009-10-14 17:00 ` raini
2009-10-14 17:21 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <f99e65f7b2fe66fc32dee931fd6bd525.squirrel@webmail.rainiday.com>
[not found] ` <f99e65f7b2fe66fc32dee931fd6bd525.squirrel-2RFepEojUI30fF+2cCIZ11aTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
2009-10-09 17:05 ` raini-9HxftnAiGddWk0Htik3J/w
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4603e94d7a85c40d7252308f394bb6ba.squirrel@webmail.rainiday.com \
--to=raini@rainiday.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=kwc@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox