From: "Gregory Baker" <gregory.baker@amd.com>
To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: julia bauer <julia.bauer@amd.com>,
Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Subject: Re: inconsistent mount attributes (ro/rw), RHEL5 / Netapp
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:24:29 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4627B3DD.5050409@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1176948355.6422.72.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
It becomes more interesting (well, to me anyways) when you compare the
behavior of RHEL3/4 (ro,rw netgroup export from filer works) with RHEL 5
(ro,rw netgroup export from filer no works).
---+ System environment
[root@build-el3-64 greg]# uname -a
Linux build-el3-64 2.4.21-47.ELsmp #1 SMP Wed Jul 5 20:30:30 EDT 2006
x86_64 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
[root@build-el3-64 greg]# rpm -qa | grep nfs-utils
nfs-utils-1.0.6-44EL
[root@build-el3-64 mnt2]# mount -V
mount: mount-2.11y
---+ NFS server (Netapp) environment
[greg@apathy greg]$ sudo rsh eng version
NetApp Release 7.2P4: Tue Nov 28 02:55:54 PST 2006
---++ NFS export file entry
[greg@apathy greg]$ sudo rsh eng exportfs | grep pandora
/vol/vol4/pandora
-sec=sys,ro,rw=@volexport-pandora,root=@volexport-pandora,anon=4058
---++ netgroup member (for export file entry above)
[root@build-el3-64 mnt2]# show_netgroup volexport-pandora | grep
build-el3-64
build-el3-64.amd.com
---+ Demonstration of ro/rw mount reporting and working
[root@build-el3-64 greg]# mount
eng:/vol/vol4/pandora/pandora-k26_g25_64-2 /mnt2
[root@build-el3-64 greg]# mount -v | grep mnt2
eng:/vol/vol4/pandora/pandora-k26_g25_64-2 on /mnt2 type nfs
(rw,addr=163.181.34
.137)
[root@build-el3-64 greg]# cat /proc/mounts | grep mnt2
eng:/vol/vol4/pandora/pandora-k26_g25_64-2 /mnt2 nfs
rw,v3,rsize=32768,wsize=327
68,hard,udp,lock,addr=eng 0 0
[root@build-el3-64 greg]# cd /mnt2
[root@build-el3-64 mnt2]# touch asdf
[root@build-el3-64 mnt2]# ls -la asdf
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 Apr 19 13:18 asdf
Ideas?
Thanks,
--Greg
Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-04-18 at 16:53 -0500, Gregory Baker wrote:
>> Note I have cases open with Redhat and Netapp, but was curious if other
>> people have also seen inconsistent mount attributes (ro/rw) when
>> mounting RHEL5 client vs. Netapp 7.2 Ontap.
>>
>> ---+ System environment
>>
>> [greg@adcgar04 greg]$ uname -a
>> Linux adcgar04 2.6.18-8.el5 #1 SMP Fri Jan 26 14:15:14 EST 2007 x86_64
>> unknown unknown GNU/Linux
>>
>> [greg@adcgar04 greg]$ rpm -qa | grep nfs-utils
>> nfs-utils-1.0.9-16.el5
>> nfs-utils-lib-1.0.8-7.2
>> nfs-utils-lib-devel-1.0.8-7.2
>> nfs-utils-lib-1.0.8-7.2
>> nfs-utils-lib-devel-1.0.8-7.2
>>
>> [greg@adcgar04 greg]$ mount -V
>> mount (util-linux 2.13-pre7)
>>
>> ---+ NFS server (Netapp) environment
>>
>> [greg@apathy greg]$ sudo rsh eng version
>> NetApp Release 7.2P4: Tue Nov 28 02:55:54 PST 2006
>>
>> ---++ NFS export file entry
>>
>> [greg@apathy greg]$ sudo rsh eng exportfs | grep pandora
>>
>> /vol/vol4/pandora
>> -sec=sys,ro,rw=@volexport-pandora,root=@volexport-pandora,anon=4058
>>
>> ---++ netgroup member (for export file entry above)
>>
>> [greg@apathy greg]$ show_netgroup volexport-pandora | grep adcgar
>> adcgar04.amd.com
>>
>> ---+ Demonstration of inconsistent ro/rw mount reporting
>>
>> [root@adcgar04 /]# mount eng:/vol/vol4/pandora/pandora-k26_g25_64-2 /mnt2
>>
>> [root@adcgar04 /]# mount -v | grep mnt2
>> eng:/vol/vol4/pandora/pandora-k26_g25_64-2 on /mnt2 type nfs
>> (rw,addr=163.181.34.137)
>>
>> [root@adcgar04 /]# cat /proc/mounts | grep mnt2
>> eng:/vol/vol4/pandora/pandora-k26_g25_64-2 /mnt2 nfs
>> ro,vers=3,rsize=65536,wsize=65536,hard,intr,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,addr=eng
>> 0 0
>>
>> [root@adcgar04 /]# cd /mnt2/
>>
>> [root@adcgar04 mnt2]# touch asdf
>> touch: cannot touch `asdf': Read-only file system
>>
>> ---+ Discussion
>>
>> ---++Linux (RHEL3/4) NFS servers that have similiar exportfs options
>>
>> /tmp *(ro,anonuid=4058) @volexport-pandora(rw,no_root_squash)
>>
>> do not cause the inconsistent behavior between mount -v and /proc/mounts
>> (and it is mounted rw as expected on the client).
>>
>> ---++ A reply from NetApp had this info:
>>
>> Starting with ONTAP 7.2.1 onward, ONTAP will display the "most
>> pessimistic" permissions to NFSv3 and NFSv4 clients. NFSv2 clients will
>> see permissions the same way as in previous releases of ONTAP, i.e. the
>> "most optimistic" permissions.
>>
>> And mounting using NFS v2 (instead of v3) does give us the expected
>> rw/rw consistency and ability.
>>
>> ---++ So now what?
>>
>> Should the linux mount -v and cat /proc/mounts be consistent with what
>> is actually happening?
>
> There is no way for the Linux client to find out that this is a
> read-only volume at mount time. Only when you try an operation that
> actually attempts to modify the filesystem will the protocol allow the
> server to return NFSERR_ROFS.
> Furthermore, there is nothing in the protocol that states that a
> filesystem that issues NFSERR_ROFS will return the same reply the next
> time the same modification is attempted. Filesystems may switch from
> being read only to not being read only at will.
>
>> Should netapp exports syntax handle a wildcard ro and a netgroup rw?
>
> That is a very good question, but it deserves to be directed to the
> appropriate people at netapp and is not really appropriate for
> nfs@lists.sourceforge.net (which is more about Linux NFS). If you
> haven't already done so, I'd suggest opening an official escalation of
> the matter. Your embedded netapp sales representative (sorry, but I'm
> not entirely up to date on who that is) should be able to help you with
> this.
>
> Cheers
> Trond
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Baker 512-602-3287 (work)
gregory.baker@amd.com 512-602-6970 (fax)
5204 E. Ben White Blvd MS 625 512-555-1212 (info)
Austin, TX 78741
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-19 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-18 21:53 inconsistent mount attributes (ro/rw), RHEL5 / Netapp Gregory Baker
[not found] ` <1176948355.6422.72.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
2007-04-19 18:24 ` Gregory Baker [this message]
2007-04-19 18:31 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-04-19 20:37 ` Gregory Baker
2007-04-19 22:11 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-04-19 22:23 ` Gregory Baker
2007-04-23 18:36 ` Gregory Baker
2007-04-24 19:57 ` Gregory Baker
2007-04-24 22:01 ` Gregory Baker
2007-05-04 20:30 ` Gregory Baker
2007-05-04 21:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-05 15:37 ` Ian Kent
2007-05-05 17:17 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-05 18:27 ` Ian Kent
2007-05-05 18:49 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-06 4:51 ` Ian Kent
2007-05-14 13:17 ` Karel Zak
2007-05-14 13:24 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-14 14:39 ` Ian Kent
2007-05-14 15:47 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-14 15:56 ` Paul Krizak
2007-05-14 16:06 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-14 16:06 ` Ian Kent
2007-05-14 22:41 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-14 23:11 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-14 23:58 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-16 0:27 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-16 1:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] NFS: Add the mount option nosharedcache Trond Myklebust
2007-05-16 3:46 ` Neil Brown
2007-05-16 13:22 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-17 2:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] NFS: Add the mount option "nosharecache" Trond Myklebust
2007-05-18 3:12 ` Ian Kent
2007-05-18 13:20 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-18 14:57 ` Ian Kent
2007-05-17 2:13 ` [PATCH] mount.nfs: Add support for the 'nosharecache' option Trond Myklebust
2007-05-17 2:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] NFS: Error when mounting the same filesystem with different options Trond Myklebust
2007-05-29 2:35 ` Neil Brown
2007-06-05 23:49 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-16 1:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-15 13:58 ` inconsistent mount attributes (ro/rw), RHEL5 / Netapp Chuck Lever
2007-05-15 14:33 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-05-15 16:57 ` Gregory Baker
2007-05-14 14:30 ` Ian Kent
2007-05-14 13:03 ` Karel Zak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4627B3DD.5050409@amd.com \
--to=gregory.baker@amd.com \
--cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
--cc=julia.bauer@amd.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox