Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: svc_process and nfsd_proc_read not taking checksum into account when calling svc_reserve
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:43:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4628D19F.5080805@redhat.com> (raw)

I think I've finally chased down a bug that I noticed at connectathon 
this year. When a client mounts a Linux NFS server using NFSv2 or 3 with 
sec=krb5i, the server gets a ton of messages like this in the logs:

RPC request reserved 80 but used 124

The sizes vary here, but usually the "used" is 44 bytes off from what 
was reserved (sometimes a little less). The issue seems to be that after 
writing out the response header, svc_process() calls this:

         /* un-reserve some of the out-queue now that we have a
          * better idea of reply size
          */
         if (procp->pc_xdrressize)
                 svc_reserve(rqstp, procp->pc_xdrressize<<2);

...but, this does not take into account the size of the checksum at the 
end of the response. This is also a problem in the svc_reserve calls 
made from nfsd3_proc_read and nfsd_proc_read.

While I haven't checked it, my guess is that this is also a problem for 
krb5p and for spkm3i too. We don't seem to see this issue with NFSv4, 
but I think that's because the reserved size for a compound packet is 
likely large enough to paper over this problem.

My thinking is that we need a wrapper of some sort around these calls to 
svc_reserve that increases the "space" parameter by the amount of the 
expected checksum. My question is -- is there a simple way to compute 
the expected length of the checksum, given a svc_rqst?

Thanks,
Jeff


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs

             reply	other threads:[~2007-04-20 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-20 14:43 Jeff Layton [this message]
2007-04-20 17:47 ` svc_process and nfsd_proc_read not taking checksum into account when calling svc_reserve J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-20 17:57   ` Kevin Coffman
2007-04-20 18:11     ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-04-20 18:33       ` Jeff Layton
2007-04-20 18:38         ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4628D19F.5080805@redhat.com \
    --to=jlayton@redhat.com \
    --cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox