From: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
To: AK <amithl_prem@yahoo.com>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Understanding nfsstat output
Date: Wed, 02 May 2007 16:30:32 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4638F4E8.6030904@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <953249.36987.qm@web56613.mail.re3.yahoo.com>
AK wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I am trying to understand the output of nfsstat to better understand
> and tweak NFS performance for our machines.
>
> Following is the output from our Solaris 9, NFSv3 running server:
>
> I am concerned about the "badcalls" for "Server nfs" output, is this
> normal or something is wrong. We have some of our clients mounting the
> exported File system with rsize & wsize = 32K, Could this be the
> problem, is there a way to narrow it down?
>
> Any feedback is greatly appreciated!
>
> ~thanks ~al
>
> # nfsstat -s
>
> Server rpc:
> Connection oriented:
> calls badcalls nullrecv badlen xdrcall dupchecks
> 101090599 0 0 0 0 62704096
> dupreqs
> 7038
> Connectionless:
> calls badcalls nullrecv badlen xdrcall dupchecks
> 17121084 0 0 0 0 7028935
> dupreqs
> 69076
>
> Server nfs:
> calls badcalls
> 118266383 57138
> Version 2: (0 calls)
> null getattr setattr root lookup readlink
> 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
> read wrcache write create remove rename
> 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
> link symlink mkdir rmdir readdir statfs
> 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
> Version 3: (117965148 calls)
> null getattr setattr lookup access readlink
> 1 0% 185486 0% 1906 0% 41482 0% 24091 0% 487 0%
> read write create mkdir symlink mknod
> 47680376 40% 69594128 58% 2516 0% 2 0% 80 0% 0 0%
> remove rmdir rename link readdir
> readdirplus
> 1658 0% 4 0% 126 0% 7 0% 1890 0% 2726 0%
> fsstat fsinfo pathconf commit
> 222331 0% 9 0% 2 0% 205840 0%
>
> Server nfs_acl:
> Version 2: (0 calls)
> null getacl setacl getattr access
> 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
> Version 3: (111 calls)
> null getacl setacl
> 0 0% 73 65% 38 34%
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would suggest asking the Solaris folks for the interpretation for the
output fields in the Solaris version of nfsstat.
That said, the number appears to be a small percentage of the total
number of calls as to not worry very much about.
ps
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-02 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-02 15:26 Understanding nfsstat output AK
2007-05-02 20:30 ` Peter Staubach [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4638F4E8.6030904@redhat.com \
--to=staubach@redhat.com \
--cc=amithl_prem@yahoo.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox