From: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
To: chuck.lever@oracle.com
Cc: Linux NFS mailing list <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: mount.nfs: chk_mountpoint()
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 08:50:40 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46CD82A0.1000408@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46CC884B.1030207@oracle.com>
Chuck Lever wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> The recent addition of the chk_mountpoint() function in
> utils/mount/mount.c in nfs-utils commit 3b55934b has broken a
> particular behavior of background mounts.
>
> nfs(5) states that, if the "bg" option is specified, "A missing mount
> point is treated as a timeout, to allow for nested NFS mounts."
>
> If I try mounting an NFS share onto a non-existent directory while
> using the "bg" option, I now get an immediate failure:
>
> mount.nfs: mount point /mnt/nothere does not exist
>
> instead of the mount backgrounding itself to wait for /mnt/nothere to
> show up. This is because chk_mountpoint() is causing the mount
> request to fail immediately.
>
> Is the documented bg retry behavior still desirable?
Isn't this what autofs is for? To be able to handle hierarchies
of mounts?
Thanx...
ps
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-23 12:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-22 19:02 mount.nfs: chk_mountpoint() Chuck Lever
2007-08-23 12:50 ` Peter Staubach [this message]
2007-08-23 17:45 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-23 18:22 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-23 20:00 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-23 20:12 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-23 20:30 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-23 20:49 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-30 10:12 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2007-08-30 11:53 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-30 16:01 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-30 16:07 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-30 16:18 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-30 19:15 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-08-30 21:11 ` Peter Staubach
2007-08-30 16:19 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-30 16:24 ` Chuck Lever
2007-08-30 16:16 ` Frank van Maarseveen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46CD82A0.1000408@redhat.com \
--to=staubach@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox