From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com>
Cc: nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/19] NFS/SUNRPC: support transport protocol naming
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:03:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <46E6BC40.2090605@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <EXNANE01PMKSUW8VcOM000004ce@exnane01.hq.netapp.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1340 bytes --]
Talpey, Thomas wrote:
> At 08:25 PM 9/10/2007, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> Just a general comment.
>>
>> I don't see how this will make it easier to add NFS client support for
>> new RPC transports. I thought we recently decided to pass down a
>> string, and let the transports themselves register a netid that matches it?
>>
>> For example, these changes are required to support RDMA -- you can't
>> just ship a new RDMA SUNRPC transport module and expect it to work
>> without this ULP change. Likewise, if we add SCTP sometime in the
>> future, will we want to make this same kind of modification to the NFS
>> client before the SCTP SUNRCP transport module works correctly?
>
> Well, the "string" discussion was in the context of the server-side
> switch,
Oops. I thought it was about both sides.
> but you call out a good goal to add transports without touching
> the upper layers.
>
> I think the choice of integer or string is basically arbitrary. One way or
> the other, some mapping from identifier to the actual transport is defined.
> Strings are a little more self-describing, but in the end harder to maintain
> for that very reason. That's the way my thinking came down, anyway.
I guess I see it the other way. The user specifies a string.
Converting it to a number means something has to keep track of the mapping.
[-- Attachment #2: chuck.lever.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 290 bytes --]
begin:vcard
fn:Chuck Lever
n:Lever;Chuck
org:Oracle Corporation;Corporate Architecture: Linux Projects Group
adr:;;1015 Granger Avenue;Ann Arbor;MI;48104;USA
title:Principal Member of Staff
tel;work:+1 248 614 5091
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://oss.oracle.com/~cel
version:2.1
end:vcard
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 228 bytes --]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 140 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-11 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-10 17:47 [PATCH 12/19] NFS/SUNRPC: support transport protocol naming Talpey, Thomas
2007-09-11 0:25 ` Chuck Lever
2007-09-11 12:16 ` Talpey, Thomas
2007-09-11 16:03 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=46E6BC40.2090605@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox