From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: Use of delayed request information in nlmsvc_lookup_host
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:54:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <473B5278.7090408@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1195069262.7584.54.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 853 bytes --]
Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 14:00 -0500, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> That's correct. I'm just trying to understand why, historically,
>> rq_daddr was just the 32-bit address and not a full sockaddr to begin
>> with. There may be something we're missing, like "we didn't want to add
>> another large field to this structure due to memory alignment or
>> allocation efficiency concerns". :-)
>
> Actually, rq_daddr by definition pretty much has to be of the same
> address family as rq_addr, since they are the two endpoints for the same
> socket.
>
> However I can't see where rq_addr is being initialised for UDP sockets.
> That is sort of worrying given that it is used among other things by the
> nfsd duplicate reply cache...
That's the other half of my question. Why isn't nlmsvc_lookup_host
using rq_addr (without the d)?
[-- Attachment #2: chuck.lever.vcf --]
[-- Type: text/x-vcard, Size: 259 bytes --]
begin:vcard
fn:Chuck Lever
n:Lever;Chuck
org:Oracle Corporation;Corporate Architecture: Linux Projects Group
adr:;;1015 Granger Avenue;Ann Arbor;MI;48104;USA
title:Principal Member of Staff
tel;work:+1 248 614 5091
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
version:2.1
end:vcard
[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 314 bytes --]
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
[-- Attachment #4: Type: text/plain, Size: 140 bytes --]
_______________________________________________
NFS maillist - NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-14 19:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-14 18:23 Use of delayed request information in nlmsvc_lookup_host Chuck Lever
2007-11-14 18:43 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-11-14 19:00 ` Chuck Lever
2007-11-14 19:32 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-11-14 19:41 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-11-14 19:50 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-11-14 19:54 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2007-11-15 1:41 ` Neil Brown
2007-11-15 13:55 ` Chuck Lever
2007-11-15 15:54 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-11-15 16:26 ` Chuck Lever
2007-11-15 17:00 ` Chuck Lever
2007-11-15 17:23 ` Chuck Lever
2007-11-15 17:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-11-15 18:02 ` Chuck Lever
2007-11-15 16:00 ` Frank van Maarseveen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=473B5278.7090408@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox