Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wendy Cheng <wcheng@redhat.com>
To: NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] NLM failover unlock
Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:31:09 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4781B91D.8090509@redhat.com> (raw)

This submission is part of the patch sets added to support NFS server 
failover where the specified export is moved from one physical server to 
another. The technical discussions can be found at cluster-devel mailing 
list archives:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/cluster-devel/2007-April/msg00028.html

The implementation has not changed much since first RFC. The external 
interfaces, however, have been revised several times. During latest code 
review, it was suggested using export path name as the interface. The 
idea was subsequently prototyped but found difficult to implement. The 
killing issue is the existing lockd reclaim code structure on backup 
server. The associated export path name is difficult to retrieve (based 
on client svc_rqst structure) when the reclaim call is invoked. The 
details is explained in:
[1] http://people.redhat.com/wcheng/Patches/NFS/NLM/004.txt

Nevertheless, as commented by few IT folks who are current managing NFS 
servers on daily basis, the lock dropping feature itself is useful, 
regardless failover and/or cluster setup. This new patch set allows 
system administrator (or cluster user mode applications) to drop NLM 
lock on server based on any one of the following two criteria:

   o Server in-bound IP address
   o Export path name (with restriction - see above [1] for details)

The reclaiming grace period can only be set based on server in-bound IP 
address and the associated patch set will be submitted after this patch 
set is settled and accepted.

-- Wendy

             reply	other threads:[~2008-01-07  5:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-01-07  5:31 Wendy Cheng [this message]
2008-02-14 18:38 ` [PATCH 0/2] NLM failover unlock Bob Bell
     [not found]   ` <20080214183833.GA26936-y89O8yXFYpDSsb2jM9SCN5/hYUUxywnI@public.gmane.org>
2008-02-14 19:04     ` Wendy Cheng
2008-02-15 16:20       ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-02-15 16:30         ` Chuck Lever
2008-02-15 16:36           ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-02-15 17:25         ` Wendy Cheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4781B91D.8090509@redhat.com \
    --to=wcheng@redhat.com \
    --cc=cluster-devel@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox