From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2BA62F1FCF for ; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 19:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761161224; cv=none; b=R2A/8kuTd/V/0GaL/wMD6fJjbroSSlRCT/D8avBl4QiATfUp8SUVz4HIXsbdg0w9EV89aCt36hTtCdkGQINJ2Sq5N1ELPR3evSUFe1Wa5XUx5GORW6yBJOdkwGBBttF7EnKTPTrVLVSsArUm/2KZbnSLEB+RTv9+qr8nj6IGMZk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761161224; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZMtm6twxeF2js/LMxUy8oWSvoiLIzGO6Js1WmlSl7XU=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:From:To:Cc:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=RzZUNU5Tm0vTyY7Z0T8TBLrgthwXmY4NkeFDw/1vlLianXDQSHLHUlmWrp2PvJor5hsVMjO0tI7V0wtWAbIO8HaDbu0REf30kYzQVMvLu+Bv+6KMbw8+/VHchWiwUOgxLc9SrGvD7deVQu9O6uMeZSIU0K33nopb9a20vkllRfI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=SV0xjOAn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="SV0xjOAn" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 96E6DC4CEE7; Wed, 22 Oct 2025 19:27:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761161224; bh=ZMtm6twxeF2js/LMxUy8oWSvoiLIzGO6Js1WmlSl7XU=; h=Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=SV0xjOAnVx/oaJIrblcwjMErH5lrVH0PCQLvg80DGU8eCWfcZkN9sefOWa/OEWXUi 1R2+ZeYMuyEzBN91QLRWVHyQ5mGCAKdLvjsOYwT4rE87KLX45c7h1MOsgitU55wkW4 Vl00tUMIFkoD6/NNVH5DapOGasQhnK7A6oqWe0DO4/Ho7yVGYp3XPBZO87WfoGJKkk O5jp1pvh7yCsZ8v0hmJ2dQJgSFXi4Zi1sutNCJqU1PM60OeKR1w5/0M3MhCWIQEIyU kvPCg8NFi8UR26Rd9ULHHTTT8ONaoSuA3RWTyTSktUYZ93gpzO5bB+MgcmiZhd24rr L5PgkwfCgreAQ== Message-ID: <47c1ef78-4864-49bf-99c3-7a0112bca01e@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:27:02 -0400 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/5] NFSD: Implement NFSD_IO_DIRECT for NFS WRITE From: Chuck Lever To: NeilBrown , Jeff Layton , Olga Kornievskaia , Dai Ngo , Tom Talpey Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Mike Snitzer References: <20251022192208.1682-1-cel@kernel.org> <20251022192208.1682-5-cel@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US Organization: kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20251022192208.1682-5-cel@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 10/22/25 3:22 PM, Chuck Lever wrote: > @@ -1311,6 +1484,9 @@ nfsd_vfs_write(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *fhp, > if (sb->s_export_op) > exp_op_flags = sb->s_export_op->flags; > > + /* cel: UNSTABLE buffered WRITEs might want some form of throttling > + * as well to prevent clients from pushing writes to us faster > + * than they can be flushed onto durable storage */ > if (test_bit(RQ_LOCAL, &rqstp->rq_flags) && > !(exp_op_flags & EXPORT_OP_REMOTE_FS)) { > /* Note: the above is an open question. I don't intend to merge this patch with the above comment included. -- Chuck Lever