From: Peter Leckie <pleckie@sgi.com>
To: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/04] NFS/RDMA client stall patches
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 10:48:34 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48321FE2.6000703@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <RTPCLUEXC1-PRDBPaa700000101-rtwIt2gI0FxT+ZUat5FNkAK/GNPrWCqfQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
Talpey, Thomas wrote:
> At 09:31 PM 5/18/2008, Peter Leckie wrote:
>
>> This patch changes rpcrdma_conn_func() to directly call
>> xprt_disconnect() instead of directly waking the pending
>> task queue.
>>
>
> Does this fix some issue, or is it simply more efficient to initiate the
> disconnect immediately? Because the conn_func is called directly
> from the RDMA provider's connection upcall, it may be entered in
> an arbitrary context, so xprt_disconnect() could be a bit heavyweight
> and lead to deadlock. Have you satisified yourself this is not the
> case?
>
Well xprt_disconnect_done() is no more heavy weight then the
rpcrdma_conn_func()
equivalent it simply clears the connected bit and labels the queues as
not connected.
The reason for calling xprt_disconnect_done() is to make a single
disconnect function.
The reason this change is needed is to allow the send and resend queues
to be drained on disconnect, patch 02 could have been changed to also
drain the these queues from rpcrdma_conn_func() however I think this is
a cleaner fix.
Thanks
Pete
>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Leckie <pleckie-cP1dWloDopni96+mSzHFpQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
>> Reviewed-by: Greg Banks <gnb-cP1dWloDopni96+mSzHFpQC/G2K4zDHf@public.gmane.org>
>> X-Sgi-Pv: 970244
>> <http://bugworks/query.cgi/970244>---
>> Index: linux-2.6.25.3/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- linux-2.6.25.3.orig/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
>> +++ linux-2.6.25.3/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/rpc_rdma.c
>> @@ -680,15 +680,13 @@ rpcrdma_conn_func(struct rpcrdma_ep *ep)
>> {
>> struct rpc_xprt *xprt = ep->rep_xprt;
>>
>> - spin_lock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
>> if (ep->rep_connected > 0) {
>> + spin_lock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
>> if (!xprt_test_and_set_connected(xprt))
>> xprt_wake_pending_tasks(xprt, 0);
>> - } else {
>> - if (xprt_test_and_clear_connected(xprt))
>> - xprt_wake_pending_tasks(xprt, ep->rep_connected);
>> - }
>> - spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
>> + spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->transport_lock);
>> + } else
>> + xprt_disconnect(xprt);
>> }
>>
>> /*
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
next parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-20 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <4830D86E.6040605@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <RTPCLUEXC1-PRDBPaa700000101@RTPMVEXC1-PRD.hq.netapp.com>
[not found] ` <RTPCLUEXC1-PRDBPaa700000101-rtwIt2gI0FxT+ZUat5FNkAK/GNPrWCqfQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-20 0:48 ` Peter Leckie [this message]
2008-05-20 13:20 ` [PATCH 03/04] NFS/RDMA client stall patches Talpey, Thomas
2008-05-19 3:51 Peter Leckie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48321FE2.6000703@sgi.com \
--to=pleckie@sgi.com \
--cc=Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox