From: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
To: "Talpey, Thomas" <Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] SUNRPC: Use RPC procedure name in call_verify
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 08:38:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <483417CE.1070308@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <RTPCLUEXC1-PRDQrwFN00000141-rtwIt2gI0FxT+ZUat5FNkAK/GNPrWCqfQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
Talpey, Thomas wrote:
> At 08:14 AM 5/21/2008, Peter Staubach wrote:
>
>> I have seen servers which didn't implement the NULL_PROC procedure
>> for protocols like NFS_ACL. Beats me why.
>>
>
> Names. We want names. :-)
:-)
Names withheld to prevent embarrassment of the guilty?
Actually, I don't remember anymore who they were, but I suspect
that I would have complained to them at the time. It just isn't
that hard to implement a procedure which doesn't do anything but
respond to the client.
ps
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-21 12:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-20 20:29 [PATCH 0/8] Initial set of 2.6.27 patches, take 2 Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <20080520202108.3851.7464.stgit-ewv44WTpT0t9HhUboXbp9zCvJB+x5qRC@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-20 20:29 ` [PATCH 1/8] NFS: Update help text for CONFIG_NFS_FS Chuck Lever
2008-05-20 20:29 ` [PATCH 2/8] SUNRPC: Use RPC procedure name in call_start Chuck Lever
2008-05-20 20:29 ` [PATCH 3/8] SUNRPC: Use RPC procedure name in call_verify Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <20080520202941.3851.61861.stgit-ewv44WTpT0t9HhUboXbp9zCvJB+x5qRC@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-20 21:21 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-05-20 21:39 ` Chuck Lever
2008-05-20 21:56 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-05-21 12:14 ` Peter Staubach
2008-05-21 12:24 ` Talpey, Thomas
[not found] ` <RTPCLUEXC1-PRDQrwFN00000141-rtwIt2gI0FxT+ZUat5FNkAK/GNPrWCqfQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-21 12:38 ` Peter Staubach [this message]
2008-05-21 15:27 ` Robert Gordon
[not found] ` <E3DF41A5-5DBA-42CE-ADE2-FAE8AC5E4722-UdXhSnd/wVw@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-21 16:02 ` Peter Staubach
2008-05-21 16:57 ` Chuck Lever
2008-05-20 20:29 ` [PATCH 4/8] SUNRPC: Don't display the rpc_show_tasks header if there are no tasks Chuck Lever
2008-05-20 20:29 ` [PATCH 5/8] SUNRPC: Refactor rpc_show_tasks Chuck Lever
2008-05-20 20:30 ` [PATCH 6/8] SUNRPC: Display some debugging information as text rather than numbers Chuck Lever
2008-05-20 20:30 ` [PATCH 7/8] SUNRPC: Rename "call_" functions that are no longer FSM states Chuck Lever
2008-05-20 20:30 ` [PATCH 8/8] SUNRPC: Display symbolic function addresses in rpc_show_tasks Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <20080520203018.3851.21166.stgit-ewv44WTpT0t9HhUboXbp9zCvJB+x5qRC@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-20 21:11 ` Trond Myklebust
2008-05-20 21:37 ` Chuck Lever
2008-05-20 21:42 ` Trond Myklebust
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-05-18 2:16 [PATCH 0/8] First set of 2.6.27 patches Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <20080518021241.8366.12464.stgit-ewv44WTpT0t9HhUboXbp9zCvJB+x5qRC@public.gmane.org>
2008-05-18 2:16 ` [PATCH 3/8] SUNRPC: Use RPC procedure name in call_verify Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=483417CE.1070308@redhat.com \
--to=staubach@redhat.com \
--cc=Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox