From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Aulbert Subject: Re: Massive NFS problems on large cluster with large number of mounts Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 07:31:23 +0200 Message-ID: <486C642B.3020100@aei.mpg.de> References: <4869E8AB.4060905@aei.mpg.de> <20080701182250.GB21807@fieldses.org> <486B89F5.9000109@aei.mpg.de> <20080702203130.GA24850@fieldses.org> <1215032676.7087.30.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Henning Fehrmann , Steffen Grunewald To: Trond Myklebust Return-path: Received: from welcomes-you.com ([85.214.50.128]:41651 "EHLO smtp.welcomes-you.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754800AbYGCFb3 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 01:31:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1215032676.7087.30.camel@localhost> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Trond Myklebust wrote: > > Alternatively, just change the values of /proc/sys/sunrpc/min_resvport > and /proc/sys/sunrpc/max_resvport to whatever range of ports you > actually want to use. That looks indeed great. We will test this hopefully today and see where the next ceiling is, we will bang our heads into ;) Thanks Carsten