From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Carsten Aulbert Subject: Re: Massive NFS problems on large cluster with large number of mounts Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:35:09 +0200 Message-ID: <486CC77D.3020608@aei.mpg.de> References: <4869E8AB.4060905@aei.mpg.de> <20080701182250.GB21807@fieldses.org> <486B89F5.9000109@aei.mpg.de> <20080702203130.GA24850@fieldses.org> <1215032676.7087.30.camel@localhost> <486C642B.3020100@aei.mpg.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Henning Fehrmann , Steffen Grunewald To: Trond Myklebust Return-path: Received: from welcomes-you.com ([85.214.50.128]:43575 "EHLO smtp.welcomes-you.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754843AbYGCMfM (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Jul 2008 08:35:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <486C642B.3020100-l1a6w7hxd2yELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Carsten Aulbert wrote: > > Trond Myklebust wrote: > >> Alternatively, just change the values of /proc/sys/sunrpc/min_resvport >> and /proc/sys/sunrpc/max_resvport to whatever range of ports you >> actually want to use. > > That looks indeed great. We will test this hopefully today and see where > the next ceiling is, we will bang our heads into ;) OK, we reached a mount count a little beyond 1300 today without any negative side-effect found so far. Thanks a lot for your answers! Cheers Carsten