From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: incorrect entries in /etc/netconfig
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:24:30 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <488A448E.3070400@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <777E985E-D123-4A74-9770-DB8DDA4DADBA@oracle.com>
Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> Sorry for taking soo long to address this...
>>
>> Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> Hi Steve-
>>>
>>> I'm trying out setconfigent() and friends from the new libtirpc.
>>>
>>> It looks like the entries in the stock /etc/netconfig on Fedora are
>>> incorrect compared with Solaris. My Fedora 8 system has this:
>>>
>>> udp tpi_clts v inet udp - -
>>> tcp tpi_cots_ord v inet tcp - -
>>> udp6 tpi_clts - inet6 udp6 - -
>>> tcp6 tpi_cots_ord - inet6 tcp6 - -
>>>
>>> but my OpenSolaris 2008.5 system has this:
>>>
>>> udp6 tpi_clts v inet6 udp /dev/udp6 -
>>> tcp6 tpi_cots_ord v inet6 tcp /dev/tcp6 -
>>> udp tpi_clts v inet udp /dev/udp -
>>> tcp tpi_cots_ord v inet tcp /dev/tcp -
>>>
>>> Note the contents of the fifth field in each row. The Fedora netconfig
>>> has "udp6" and "tcp6" as the protonames, which I think is incorrect.
>>> These should be "udp" and "tcp". Only the netids (the first field)
>>> should have the extra "6" suffix. The protocol names should always be
>>> "udp" or "tcp", no matter which address family is used.
>>>
>>> Can you fix this up in the libtirpc package?
>> It is in later releases... to be honest I'm not sure how
>> it got that way.. It did not seem to be broken in the
>> stock F8 (libtirpc-0.1.7-12), F9 or rawhide packages
>
> FYI: I just hit this again on a fairly fresh F9 install.
>
> I wonder if installing libtirpc-devel breaks /etc/netconfig?
Is there a /etc/netconfig.rpmnew file?
steved.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-25 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-01 20:30 incorrect entries in /etc/netconfig Chuck Lever
2008-07-08 17:40 ` Steve Dickson
[not found] ` <4873A681.5080409-AfCzQyP5zfLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-09 1:44 ` Chuck Lever
2008-07-25 18:32 ` Chuck Lever
2008-07-25 21:24 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
[not found] ` <488A448E.3070400-AfCzQyP5zfLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-25 22:58 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=488A448E.3070400@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox