Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: incorrect entries in /etc/netconfig
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:24:30 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <488A448E.3070400@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <777E985E-D123-4A74-9770-DB8DDA4DADBA@oracle.com>



Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Jul 8, 2008, at 1:40 PM, Steve Dickson wrote:
>> Sorry for taking soo long to address this...
>>
>> Chuck Lever wrote:
>>> Hi Steve-
>>>
>>> I'm trying out setconfigent() and friends from the new libtirpc.
>>>
>>> It looks like the entries in the stock /etc/netconfig on Fedora are
>>> incorrect compared with Solaris.  My Fedora 8 system has this:
>>>
>>> udp        tpi_clts      v     inet     udp     -       -
>>> tcp        tpi_cots_ord  v     inet     tcp     -       -
>>> udp6       tpi_clts      -     inet6    udp6     -       -
>>> tcp6       tpi_cots_ord  -     inet6    tcp6    -       -
>>>
>>> but my OpenSolaris 2008.5 system has this:
>>>
>>> udp6       tpi_clts      v     inet6   udp    /dev/udp6       -
>>> tcp6       tpi_cots_ord  v     inet6   tcp    /dev/tcp6       -
>>> udp        tpi_clts      v     inet    udp    /dev/udp        -
>>> tcp        tpi_cots_ord  v     inet    tcp    /dev/tcp        -
>>>
>>> Note the contents of the fifth field in each row.  The Fedora netconfig
>>> has "udp6" and "tcp6" as the protonames, which I think is incorrect.
>>> These should be "udp" and "tcp".  Only the netids (the first field)
>>> should have the extra "6" suffix.  The protocol names should always be
>>> "udp" or "tcp", no matter which address family is used.
>>>
>>> Can you fix this up in the libtirpc package?
>> It is in later releases... to be honest I'm not sure how
>> it got that way.. It did not seem to be broken in the
>> stock F8 (libtirpc-0.1.7-12), F9 or rawhide packages
> 
> FYI: I just hit this again on a fairly fresh F9 install.
> 
> I wonder if installing libtirpc-devel breaks /etc/netconfig?
Is there a /etc/netconfig.rpmnew file? 

steved.

  reply	other threads:[~2008-07-25 21:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-07-01 20:30 incorrect entries in /etc/netconfig Chuck Lever
2008-07-08 17:40 ` Steve Dickson
     [not found]   ` <4873A681.5080409-AfCzQyP5zfLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-09  1:44     ` Chuck Lever
2008-07-25 18:32     ` Chuck Lever
2008-07-25 21:24       ` Steve Dickson [this message]
     [not found]         ` <488A448E.3070400-AfCzQyP5zfLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-07-25 22:58           ` Chuck Lever

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=488A448E.3070400@RedHat.com \
    --to=steved@redhat.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox