From: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] svcrdma: Fix race between svc_rdma_recvfrom thread and the dto_tasklet
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:31:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48A352BE.1080204@opengridcomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080813211018.GM26765@fieldses.org>
J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 11:05:41AM -0500, Tom Tucker wrote:
>> RDMA_READ completions are kept on a separate queue from the general
>> I/O request queue. Since a separate lock is used to protect the RDMA_READ
>> completion queue, a race exists between the dto_tasklet and the
>> svc_rdma_recvfrom thread where the dto_tasklet sets the XPT_DATA
>> bit and adds I/O to the read-completion queue. Concurrently, the
>> recvfrom thread checks the generic queue, finds it empty and resets
>> the XPT_DATA bit. A subsequent svc_xprt_enqueue will fail to enqueue
>> the transport for I/O and cause the transport to "stall".
>>
>> The fix is to protect both lists with the same lock and set the XPT_DATA
>> bit with this lock held.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tom Tucker <tom@opengridcomputing.com>
>
> OK. As a bugfix, would you like this sent in now for 2.6.27?
>
Yes I would if that's possible. I put it before all the other patches so it
would be independent.
Thanks,
Tom
> --b.
>
>> ---
>> include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h | 1 -
>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c | 8 ++++----
>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c | 5 ++---
>> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h
>> index ef2e3a2..dc05b54 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/sunrpc/svc_rdma.h
>> @@ -143,7 +143,6 @@ struct svcxprt_rdma {
>> unsigned long sc_flags;
>> struct list_head sc_dto_q; /* DTO tasklet I/O pending Q */
>> struct list_head sc_read_complete_q;
>> - spinlock_t sc_read_complete_lock;
>> struct work_struct sc_work;
>> };
>> /* sc_flags */
>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
>> index b4b17f4..74de31a 100644
>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c
>> @@ -443,18 +443,18 @@ int svc_rdma_recvfrom(struct svc_rqst *rqstp)
>>
>> dprintk("svcrdma: rqstp=%p\n", rqstp);
>>
>> - spin_lock_bh(&rdma_xprt->sc_read_complete_lock);
>> + spin_lock_bh(&rdma_xprt->sc_rq_dto_lock);
>> if (!list_empty(&rdma_xprt->sc_read_complete_q)) {
>> ctxt = list_entry(rdma_xprt->sc_read_complete_q.next,
>> struct svc_rdma_op_ctxt,
>> dto_q);
>> list_del_init(&ctxt->dto_q);
>> }
>> - spin_unlock_bh(&rdma_xprt->sc_read_complete_lock);
>> - if (ctxt)
>> + if (ctxt) {
>> + spin_unlock_bh(&rdma_xprt->sc_rq_dto_lock);
>> return rdma_read_complete(rqstp, ctxt);
>> + }
>>
>> - spin_lock_bh(&rdma_xprt->sc_rq_dto_lock);
>> if (!list_empty(&rdma_xprt->sc_rq_dto_q)) {
>> ctxt = list_entry(rdma_xprt->sc_rq_dto_q.next,
>> struct svc_rdma_op_ctxt,
>> diff --git a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
>> index 19ddc38..900cb69 100644
>> --- a/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
>> +++ b/net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c
>> @@ -359,11 +359,11 @@ static void sq_cq_reap(struct svcxprt_rdma *xprt)
>> if (test_bit(RDMACTXT_F_LAST_CTXT, &ctxt->flags)) {
>> struct svc_rdma_op_ctxt *read_hdr = ctxt->read_hdr;
>> BUG_ON(!read_hdr);
>> + spin_lock_bh(&xprt->sc_rq_dto_lock);
>> set_bit(XPT_DATA, &xprt->sc_xprt.xpt_flags);
>> - spin_lock_bh(&xprt->sc_read_complete_lock);
>> list_add_tail(&read_hdr->dto_q,
>> &xprt->sc_read_complete_q);
>> - spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->sc_read_complete_lock);
>> + spin_unlock_bh(&xprt->sc_rq_dto_lock);
>> svc_xprt_enqueue(&xprt->sc_xprt);
>> }
>> svc_rdma_put_context(ctxt, 0);
>> @@ -428,7 +428,6 @@ static struct svcxprt_rdma *rdma_create_xprt(struct svc_serv *serv,
>> init_waitqueue_head(&cma_xprt->sc_send_wait);
>>
>> spin_lock_init(&cma_xprt->sc_lock);
>> - spin_lock_init(&cma_xprt->sc_read_complete_lock);
>> spin_lock_init(&cma_xprt->sc_rq_dto_lock);
>>
>> cma_xprt->sc_ord = svcrdma_ord;
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-08-13 21:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-13 16:05 [PATCH] svcrdma: Fix race between svc_rdma_recvfrom thread and the dto_tasklet Tom Tucker
2008-08-13 21:10 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-08-13 21:31 ` Tom Tucker [this message]
[not found] <1218579184-46881-1-git-send-email-tom@opengridcomputing.com>
2009-07-27 21:33 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-07-27 21:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-07-27 21:43 ` Tom Tucker
2009-07-27 22:09 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48A352BE.1080204@opengridcomputing.com \
--to=tom@opengridcomputing.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox