From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Doug Hughes Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11448] New: NFS client has inconsistent write flushing to non-linux serversa Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:33:05 -0400 Message-ID: <48B70B81.5060200@will.to> References: <20080828132753.08bfe05f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, bugme-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org To: Andrew Morton Return-path: Received: from mailman.will.to ([68.164.136.125]:49873 "EHLO will.to" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752913AbYH1Urb (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:47:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080828132753.08bfe05f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Andrew Morton wrote: > (switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the > bugzilla web interface). > > On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:41:08 -0700 (PDT) > bugme-daemon-590EEB7GvNiWaY/ihj7yzEB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org wrote: > > >> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11448 >> >> Summary: NFS client has inconsistent write flushing to non-linux >> serversa >> Product: File System >> Version: 2.5 >> KernelVersion: 2.6.22.15 >> Platform: All >> OS/Version: Linux >> Tree: Mainline >> Status: NEW >> Severity: normal >> Priority: P1 >> Component: NFS >> AssignedTo: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no >> ReportedBy: doug-rDJHdQPhaF8@public.gmane.org >> >> >> Latest working kernel version: N/A (works on 2.6.18 with Linux NFS server, but >> we cannot continue to use that kernel for various reasons) >> Earliest failing kernel version: N/A (2.6.18, 2.6.24, and 2.6.25 are also known >> to fail by another party experiencing same bug against non-Linux NFS servers). >> Not currently known to be reproducible against NetApp, but this is not >> authoritative (lack of seeing a bug does not guarantee lack of existence) >> Distribution: CentOS 4.6 >> Hardware Environment: supermicro twin, 2 quad core Harpertown CPU, 16G ram. >> Software Environment: CentOS 4.6 >> Problem Description: >> >> NFS client writes to Sun Solaris 10 U4 server. >> at some point in time, there is an empty portion of the output file from the >> writer containing missing data (shows as NULL bytes from another NFS client >> issuing a tail -f on the file being written). >> confirmed that the file as exists on the NFS server is sparse, missing bytes >> (not necessarily multiple of 512 or 1024, one sample is a gap of 3818 bytes, >> another is 1895 bytes, another is 423 bytes) >> >> if you do a read of the entire file from the NFS client doing the writing, it >> causes the non-flushed writes to be instantly flushed to the server followed by >> a NFS3 commit operation. The data then can be seen on all other NFS clients. >> >> If you do an open of the file alone, no flush >> if you do an open and a close, no flush >> if you do an open and a read at the beginning of the file (far before the data >> that is outstanding), *usually* no flush (one case where it did). >> If you do a read at another position in the file, no flush (other than as >> indicated above). >> If you do a read at the indicated offset where the bytes are null, it causes >> the NFS client to write and NFS commit to the server (truss output available) >> >> The missing blocks may flush themselves after undefined periods of time which >> can be hours. Our runs last days. >> >> Steps to reproduce: >> >> Chemist running NAMD sees frequent cases of this in his output trajectory index >> files. We don't have an exact sequence of steps to reproduce. After I file this >> ticket I will be giving ticket number to another person I know at a different >> company experiencing the same problem as described above (to the best of my >> knowledge) >> >> > > That seems rather ugly. > > 2.6.22 is getting a bit old though. It's quite possible that this was > subsequently fixed, in which case upgrading your kernel or hassling the > vendor to backport the fix would be needed. > I am in the process of trying to duplicate this on 2.6.26.. I need the chemist to change his machine. (it's a kernel.org kernel for reasons of IB support, so no vendor to hassle). There is another party to this bug who seems to have the same symptoms in 2.6.25 who is trying to capture packet data and reproduce.