From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: mike.eisler@netapp.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs(5): Replace the term "netid" in mount option descriptions
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 07:53:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <48E0C1C7.4060201@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080924182235.3000.71437.stgit-lQeC5l55kZ7wdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>
Chuck Lever wrote:
> TI-RPC introduced the concept of "netid" which is a string that is
> mapped to a set of transport capabilities via a netconfig database.
> RPC services register a netid and bindaddr with their local rpcbind
> daemon to advertise their ability to support particular transports.
>
> Mike Eisler noted that the use of the term "netid" in nfs(5) is not
> appropriate, since Linux does not treat the value of the proto= or
> mountproto= options as a netid proper, but rather to select a
> particular transport capability provided locally on the client.
>
> The Linux NFS client currently uses a simple internal mapping between
> these names and its own transport capabilities rather than using the
> names as part of an rpcbind query, thus these strings are really not
> netids. They are more akin to what TI-RPC calls "protocol names".
>
> Remove the term "netid" from nfs(5) for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> Cc: Mike Eisler <mike.eisler@netapp.com>
Committed...
steved.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-29 11:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-24 18:24 [PATCH] nfs(5): Replace the term "netid" in mount option descriptions Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <20080924182235.3000.71437.stgit-lQeC5l55kZ7wdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>
2008-09-29 11:53 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=48E0C1C7.4060201@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.eisler@netapp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox