From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs(5): Clarify behavior of the mountproto= and proto=
 options
Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2008 10:58:56 -0400
Message-ID: <48ECCAB0.7080102@RedHat.com>
References: <20081002155516.25702.69105.stgit@manray.1015granger.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Thomas.Talpey@netapp.com
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Return-path: <linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:34124 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750753AbYJHPA5 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 8 Oct 2008 11:00:57 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20081002155516.25702.69105.stgit-meopP2rzCrTwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>
Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org>



Chuck Lever wrote:
> Document the interaction between the mountproto= and the proto= mount
> options in a new subsection of nfs(5).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
> ---
Committed...

steved