From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: "Dr. Tilmann Bubeck" <t.bubeck-dx1aEnP5Zukb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Is order for "exportfs -r" and rpc.mountd important?
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:59:31 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4937E243.1080608@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200812041025.02563.t.bubeck-dx1aEnP5Zukb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
Dr. Tilmann Bubeck wrote:
> Sorry for the confusion. Maybe I can make myself clearer this time:
>
> Fedora 10 uses the following simplified /etc/init.d/nfs to start the NFS
> server:
>
> 1. exportfs -r
> 2. modprobe nfsd
> This also does (see modprobe.conf.dist): mount -t nfsd nfsd /proc/fs/nfsd
>
> As you can read in "man exportfs" there are two modes: "legacy" and "new"
> depending on the existance of /proc/fs/nfsd. The above version of
> /etc/init.d/nfs executes exportfs in lecacy mode and therefore feeds
> /var/lib/nfs/rmtab into the kernel. After "mount -t nfsd ..." the "new" mode
> is used. In this case the previously fed rmtab is disturbing because we have
> a mix of "legacy" and "new" mode. This results in the problem that some NFS
> clients are receiving a "Stale NFS file handle" after a server reboot.
>
> I tracked the problem down to the kernel based export table which is found
> in /proc/fs/nfsd/exports. The above start order results in:
>
> root# cat /proc/fs/nfsd/exports | grep dhcp-10-1-1-209
> /home
> dhcp-10-1-1-209.loef.reinform.de(rw,root_squash,sync,wdelay,no_subtree_check,fsid=1510)
>
> which results from "exportfs -r" reading rmtab and feeding into the kernel.
>
> By changing the start order to:
>
> 1. modprobe nfsd
> This also does (see modprobe.conf.dist): mount -t nfsd nfsd /proc/fs/nfsd
> 2. exportfs -r
>
> then "exportfs -r" starts in "new" mode and does not feed the rmtab into the
> kernel.
This has been fixed in both Fedora 9 and 10... The update nfs-utils version
should be hitting a yum repository near you soon...
steved.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-12-04 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-11-28 14:41 Is order for "exportfs -r" and rpc.mountd important? Dr. Tilmann Bubeck
[not found] ` <200811281541.39272.t.bubeck-dx1aEnP5Zukb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-11-28 16:05 ` Dr. Tilmann Bubeck
[not found] ` <200811281705.45087.t.bubeck-dx1aEnP5Zukb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-03 17:25 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-12-04 9:25 ` Dr. Tilmann Bubeck
[not found] ` <200812041025.02563.t.bubeck-dx1aEnP5Zukb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-04 13:59 ` Steve Dickson [this message]
[not found] ` <4937E243.1080608-AfCzQyP5zfLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-04 14:16 ` Dr. Tilmann Bubeck
[not found] ` <200812041516.14114.t.bubeck-dx1aEnP5Zukb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org>
2008-12-04 14:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-12-04 14:43 ` Steve Dickson
2008-12-05 6:05 ` Neil Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4937E243.1080608@RedHat.com \
--to=steved@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=t.bubeck-dx1aEnP5Zukb1SvskN2V4Q@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox