From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg Banks Subject: Re: [patch 0/3] First tranche of SGI Enhanced NFS patches Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:26:46 +1100 Message-ID: <4990BBB6.4000006@sgi.com> References: <20090113102633.719563000@sgi.com> <498FBE0B.1040104@melbourne.sgi.com> <20090209204726.GH13636@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Linux NFS ML To: "J. Bruce Fields" Return-path: Received: from relay3.sgi.com ([192.48.171.31]:58134 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751490AbZBIX33 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Feb 2009 18:29:29 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090209204726.GH13636@fieldses.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: J. Bruce Fields wrote: > On Mon, Feb 09, 2009 at 04:24:27PM +1100, Greg Banks wrote: > >> Bruce, any word on these? I don't seem to have any specific review >> items that I need to pay attention to with these patches, and I don't >> see them in your for-2.6.30 branch, so can I get an ack or a nack or >> feedback on things that need fixing? >> > > Sorry, that came around the time of the citi compromise, so I just > registered that it had gotten some responses, figured it'd probably be > resent, and filed it away.... > Aha. The conversations didn't result in any specific feedback items or improvements that I can see, unless I'm misunderstanding what people said. So I don't have any newer versions of the patches to send. Do you want me to resend anyway? > > We now believe that password-logging ssh and sshd were installed on citi > machines as early as November. [...] Ouch. Well, that explains the linux-nfs.org outages. -- Greg Banks, P.Engineer, SGI Australian Software Group. the brightly coloured sporks of revolution. I don't speak for SGI.