From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Dickson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Further nfs-utils clean ups Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2009 06:26:52 -0500 Message-ID: <49AFB6FC.5080702@RedHat.com> References: <20090304234711.28749.7018.stgit@ingres.1015granger.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Chuck Lever Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:35569 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750868AbZCEL3c (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2009 06:29:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20090304234711.28749.7018.stgit-07a7zB5ZJzbwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Chuck Lever wrote: > Hi Steve- > > Here are six more patches that clean up various issues to prepare for > the widespread use of TI-RPC in nfs-utils. > > We discovered a type width mismatch issue between our legacy RPC > headers and the TI-RPC run-time that will be addressed in a subsequent > patch series by using TI-RPC to build all of nfs-utils. This issue > should be addressed before the next release of nfs-utils is published. > > The idea will be to build nfs-utils with either glibc's legacy RPC > implementation and the legacy RPC headers (as it is today in 1.1.3), > or with libtirpc and TI-RPC's headers, based on the setting of > --enable-tirpc (which defaults to --disable-tirpc). > > This further insulates ongoing IPv6 work from folks who need to use > today's up-to-date version of nfs-utils, while easily allowing us to > test a version built with complete TI-RPC integration. > Committed... steved.