Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: Ni Wenjuan <niwj@cn.fujitsu.com>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS4ERR_SYMLINK  error
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2009 20:59:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49B2C404.3060907@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090306213234.GB1779@fieldses.org>

On Mar. 06, 2009, 23:32 +0200, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 12:09:40PM +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> On Mar. 05, 2009, 11:32 +0200, Ni Wenjuan <niwj@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
>>> the result of newpynfs test case of  LINK4a .  if you link with target directoty
>>>  is a symbole file,it should get NFS4ERR_NOTDIR ,instead got NFS4ERR_SYMLINK.
>>>
>>> THE LINK operation  don't list NFS4ERR_SYMLINK as valid errors in the spec. But
>>> NFS4ERR_SYMLINK seems like a reasonable error.  Is this an oversight
>>> in the spec, or something we need to fix?
>> Although NFSv4.1 adds NFS4ERR_SYMLINK to LINK's allowed errors list
>> (and this might be an indication for it being an oversight in rfc3530),
> 
> The error lists in rfc3530 are known to be incomplete in some cases, so
> before adding an exception like this I'd like something more.  (E.g.:
> does this cause any client or application to fail?  Is there some
> logical reason notdir is a more useful error than symlink?)

FWIW, the linux nfs client translates NFS4ERR_SYMLINK to -ELOOP
which is awkward and less descriptive to the app / user than
-ENOTDIR.  That said, I don't think a careful client implementation
should ever get NFS4ERR_SYMLINK if it stats the directory it operates
on before sending the link op (or lookup, create, rename, etc.) to make
sure it is indeed a directory, right?.

Benny

> 
> --b.
> 
>> NFSv4.0 doesn't allow it so this needs to be fixed.
>>
>> Can you please test the following patch?
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
>> ---
>>
>> git diff --stat -p fs/nfsd/vfs.c
>>  fs/nfsd/vfs.c |    3 +++
>>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
>> index 6e50aaa..9165b1f 100644
>> --- a/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
>> +++ b/fs/nfsd/vfs.c
>> @@ -1637,6 +1637,9 @@ out_dput:
>>  out_unlock:
>>  	fh_unlock(ffhp);
>>  out:
>> +	/* nfserr_symlink returned from fh_verify is inappropriate for LINK */
>> +	if (err == nfserr_symlink)
>> +		err = nfserr_notdir;
>>  	return err;
>>  
>>  out_nfserr:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2009-03-07 19:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-05  9:32 NFS4ERR_SYMLINK error Ni Wenjuan
2009-03-05 10:09 ` Benny Halevy
2009-03-06 21:32   ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-03-07 18:59     ` Benny Halevy [this message]
2009-03-09 18:06       ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-03-09 18:18         ` Trond Myklebust
2009-03-13  8:13         ` Yang Hongyang
2009-03-18 23:06           ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-03-19  6:51             ` [PATCH] NFSD: do not return nfserr_symlink for the LINK operation Benny Halevy
2009-03-19  6:59               ` Yang Hongyang
2009-03-19  7:04                 ` Benny Halevy
2009-03-19  8:18                   ` Yang Hongyang
2009-03-19  9:25                     ` Benny Halevy
2009-03-19  9:30                       ` Yang Hongyang
2009-03-19  9:53                         ` Benny Halevy
2009-03-19  9:34                       ` Yang Hongyang
2009-03-19 10:00                         ` Benny Halevy
2009-03-19  9:46                       ` Yang Hongyang
2009-03-19 20:00                         ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-03-19 20:15                           ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-03-20  6:16                             ` Yang Hongyang
2009-03-20  5:59                           ` Yang Hongyang
2009-03-20  7:05                           ` Yang Hongyang
2009-04-03  5:18                             ` Yang Hongyang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49B2C404.3060907@panasas.com \
    --to=bhalevy@panasas.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=niwj@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox