Linux NFS development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] Address type width mismatches between TI-RPC and glibc
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:44:40 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49BE9008.7030101@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090305173533.30471.41413.stgit-07a7zB5ZJzbwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>



Chuck Lever wrote:
> Steve-
> 
> Now that the clean up is finished, here are the patches that actually
> fix the type width mismatch problem between glibc headers and the
> TI-RPC run-time.
> 
> This patch set implements a full switch between TI-RPC run-time and
> headers and legacy glibc RPC run-time and headers via --enable-tirpc.
> 
> In addition there are a number of configure.ac clean ups.
> 
> These are the final patches needed to support TI-RPC and IPv6 properly
> in mount.nfs, umount.nfs, and showmount.
> 
> ---
> 
> Chuck Lever (7):
>       nfs-utils: Include legacy or TI-RPC headers, not both
>       configure: move IPv6 feature checks into aclocal/
>       configure: Move rpcsecgss checking into aclocal
>       configure: pull common nfsidmap and event checks into aclocal/
>       nfs-utils: replace function-specific switches with HAVE_LIBTIRPC
>       configure: move TI-RPC checks into aclocal/
>       configure: add defensive quoting in some function checks
> 
> Jeff Layton (2):
>       nfs-utils: clean up handling of libgssglue in gssd Makefile
>       nfs-utils: don't need extra libs to do AC_CHECK_LIBS for librpcsecgss
> 
committed...

steved.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2009-03-16 17:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-03-05 17:41 [PATCH 0/9] Address type width mismatches between TI-RPC and glibc Chuck Lever
     [not found] ` <20090305173533.30471.41413.stgit-07a7zB5ZJzbwdl/1UfZZQIVfYA8g3rJ/@public.gmane.org>
2009-03-05 17:41   ` [PATCH 1/9] configure: add defensive quoting in some function checks Chuck Lever
2009-03-05 17:41   ` [PATCH 2/9] configure: move TI-RPC checks into aclocal/ Chuck Lever
2009-03-05 17:42   ` [PATCH 3/9] nfs-utils: replace function-specific switches with HAVE_LIBTIRPC Chuck Lever
2009-03-05 17:42   ` [PATCH 4/9] configure: pull common nfsidmap and event checks into aclocal/ Chuck Lever
2009-03-05 17:42   ` [PATCH 5/9] configure: Move rpcsecgss checking into aclocal Chuck Lever
2009-03-05 17:42   ` [PATCH 6/9] nfs-utils: don't need extra libs to do AC_CHECK_LIBS for librpcsecgss Chuck Lever
2009-03-05 17:42   ` [PATCH 7/9] configure: move IPv6 feature checks into aclocal/ Chuck Lever
2009-03-05 17:42   ` [PATCH 8/9] nfs-utils: Include legacy or TI-RPC headers, not both Chuck Lever
2009-03-05 17:42   ` [PATCH 9/9] nfs-utils: clean up handling of libgssglue in gssd Makefile Chuck Lever
2009-03-16 17:44   ` Steve Dickson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49BE9008.7030101@RedHat.com \
    --to=steved@redhat.com \
    --cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox