public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wang Chen <wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: neilb@suse.de, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	FNST-Bian Naimeng <biannm@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs lockd: detect grace_list corruption
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 17:17:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0155A0.4020008@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090424231252.GD22477@fieldses.org>

J. Bruce Fields said the following on 2009-4-25 7:12:
> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 11:09:44AM +0800, Wang Chen wrote:
>> Although I can't reproduce it now, it really happened that some lock manager
>> started grace period but didn't end it.
>> This causes an lm entry be left in grace_list, and when service nfs restart,
>> the same lm will be added again into the list.
>> As you know, adding an entry, which is in the list, to a list will leads to
>> list corruption.
> 
> I'd really like to understand why locks_end_grace() isn't being called.
> I'm probably overlooking something obvious, but I just can't see how
> lockd or nfsd can be shut down right now without locks_end_grace() being
> called.
> 

Me neither can figure out why locks_end_grace() isn't being called.

But do locks_start_grace() twice can trigger this warning too.
You can do
1. service nfs restart
2. (immediately) kill -s SIGKILL lockd
this can trigger
---
lockd(void *vrqstp)
...
		if (signalled()) {
			flush_signals(current);
			if (nlmsvc_ops) {
				nlmsvc_invalidate_all();
				set_grace_period();
---
and makes locks_start_grace() be called twice without locks_end_grace().

So I still suggest to do something to protect the lm list. :)


  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-06  9:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-24  3:09 [PATCH] nfs lockd: detect grace_list corruption Wang Chen
2009-04-24  5:15 ` Bian Naimeng
2009-04-24  7:35 ` [PATCH V2] " Wang Chen
2009-04-24 23:12 ` [PATCH] " J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-06  9:17   ` Wang Chen [this message]
2009-05-06 20:32     ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-07  6:51       ` Wang Chen
2009-05-08 18:26         ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-11  6:13           ` Wang Chen
2009-05-11 20:57             ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-12  0:43               ` Wang Chen
2009-05-12 19:13                 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-13  2:24                   ` Wang Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A0155A0.4020008@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=wangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=biannm@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=neilb@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox