From: "Sachin S. Prabhu" <sprabhu@redhat.com>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Virtual IPs and blocking locks
Date: Fri, 15 May 2009 15:48:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A0D80B6.4070101@redhat.com> (raw)
We have had a few reported cases of problems using blocking locks on nfs shares
mounted using virtual ips. In these cases, the NFS server was using a floating
ip for clustering purposes.
Please consider the transaction below
NFS client: 10.33.8.75
NFS Server:
Primary IP : 10.33.8.71
Floating IP: 10.33.8.77
$ tshark -r block-virtual.pcap -R 'nlm'
19 2.487622 10.33.8.75 -> 10.33.8.77 NLM V4 LOCK Call FH:0x6176411a svid:4
pos:0-0
22 2.487760 10.33.8.77 -> 10.33.8.75 NLM V4 LOCK Reply (Call In 19)
NLM_BLOCKED
33 2.489518 10.33.8.71 -> 10.33.8.75 NLM V4 GRANTED_MSG Call FH:0x6176411a
svid:4 pos:0-0
36 2.489635 10.33.8.75 -> 10.33.8.71 NLM V4 GRANTED_MSG Reply (Call In 33)
46 2.489977 10.33.8.75 -> 10.33.8.71 NLM V4 GRANTED_RES Call NLM_DENIED
49 2.490096 10.33.8.71 -> 10.33.8.75 NLM V4 GRANTED_RES Reply (Call In 46)
19 - A lock request is sent from the client to the floating ip.
22 - A NLM_BLOCKED request is sent back by the Floating ip to the client.
33 - Server Primary IP address returns a NLM_GRANTED using the async callback
mechanism.
36 - Ack for GRANTED_MSG in 33.
47 - Client returns a NLM_DENIED to the SERVER. This is done since it doesn't
match the locks requested.
49 - Ack for GRANTED_RES in 46.
In this case, the GRANTED_MSG is sent by the primary ip as determined by the
routing table. This lock grant is rejected by the server since the ip address of
the server doesn't match the ip address of the server against which the request
was made. The locks are eventually granted after a 30 second poll timeout on the
client.
Similar problems are also seen when nfs shares are exported from GFS filesystems
since GFS uses deferred locks.
The problem was introduced by commit 5ac5f9d1ce8492163dbde5d357dc5d03becf7e36
which adds a check for the server ip address. This causes a regression for
clients which mount off a virtual ip address from the server.
A possible fix for this issue is to use the server ip address in the nlm_lock.oh
field used to make the request and compare it to the nlm_lock.oh returned in the
GRANTED_MSG call instead of checking the ip address of the server calling making
the GRANTED_MSG call.
Sachin Prabhu
next reply other threads:[~2009-05-15 14:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-15 14:48 Sachin S. Prabhu [this message]
2009-05-15 16:50 ` Virtual IPs and blocking locks Rob Gardner
2009-05-18 13:41 ` Sachin S. Prabhu
2009-05-18 13:46 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-05-18 13:55 ` Rob Gardner
2009-05-19 20:43 ` Huge race in lockd for async lock requests? Rob Gardner
2009-05-19 21:33 ` Tom Talpey
2009-05-20 6:55 ` Rob Gardner
2009-05-20 14:00 ` Tom Talpey
[not found] ` <4a140d0a.85c2f10a.53bc.0979-ATjtLOhZ0NVl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-20 14:14 ` Tom Talpey
[not found] ` <4a14106e.48c3f10a.7ce3.0e55-ATjtLOhZ0NVl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-20 23:20 ` Rob Gardner
2009-05-20 16:37 ` Rob Gardner
2009-05-28 20:05 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-28 21:34 ` Rob Gardner
2009-05-29 0:26 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-29 2:59 ` Rob Gardner
2009-05-29 13:22 ` Tom Talpey
[not found] ` <4a1fe1c0.06045a0a.165b.5fbc-ATjtLOhZ0NVl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-29 15:24 ` Rob Gardner
2009-05-29 19:14 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A0D80B6.4070101@redhat.com \
--to=sprabhu@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox