public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no,
	linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [patch for 2.6.30? 1/1] lockd: fix FILE_LOCKING=n build error
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 15:47:26 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A1B1FFE.6030209@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090513195953.GF13420@fieldses.org>

J. Bruce Fields wrote:
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 01:28:09PM -0700, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote:
>> From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
>>
>> lockd/svclock.c is missing a header file <linux/fs.h>.
>>
>> <linux/fs.h> is missing a definition of locks_release_private()
>> for the config case of FILE_LOCKING=n, causing a build error:
>>
>> fs/lockd/svclock.c:330: error: implicit declaration of function 'locks_release_private'
>>
> 
> Thanks, applied for 2.6.31.

linux-next builds still fail since this patch isn't in linux-next.
Is there a way to have this patch in some linux-next tree?

Thanks.

> --b.
> 
>> lockd without FILE_LOCKING doesn't make sense, so make LOCKD and LOCKD_V4
>> depend on FILE_LOCKING, and make NFS depend on FILE_LOCKING.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
>> Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
>> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>> ---
>>
>>  fs/Kconfig     |    2 ++
>>  fs/nfs/Kconfig |    2 +-
>>  2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff -puN fs/Kconfig~lockd-fix-file_locking=n-build-error fs/Kconfig
>> --- a/fs/Kconfig~lockd-fix-file_locking=n-build-error
>> +++ a/fs/Kconfig
>> @@ -236,10 +236,12 @@ source "fs/nfsd/Kconfig"
>>  
>>  config LOCKD
>>  	tristate
>> +	depends on FILE_LOCKING
>>  
>>  config LOCKD_V4
>>  	bool
>>  	depends on NFSD_V3 || NFS_V3
>> +	depends on FILE_LOCKING
>>  	default y
>>  
>>  config EXPORTFS
>> diff -puN fs/nfs/Kconfig~lockd-fix-file_locking=n-build-error fs/nfs/Kconfig
>> --- a/fs/nfs/Kconfig~lockd-fix-file_locking=n-build-error
>> +++ a/fs/nfs/Kconfig
>> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
>>  config NFS_FS
>>  	tristate "NFS client support"
>> -	depends on INET
>> +	depends on INET && FILE_LOCKING
>>  	select LOCKD
>>  	select SUNRPC
>>  	select NFS_ACL_SUPPORT if NFS_V3_ACL
>> _


-- 
~Randy
LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon
http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/

  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-25 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-12 20:28 [patch for 2.6.30? 1/1] lockd: fix FILE_LOCKING=n build error akpm
     [not found] ` <200905122047.n4CKlP24029339-AB4EexQrvXRQetFLy7KEm3xJsTq8ys+cHZ5vskTnxNA@public.gmane.org>
2009-05-13 19:59   ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-05-25 22:47     ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2009-05-26 21:53       ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A1B1FFE.6030209@oracle.com \
    --to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox