From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: "Carlos André" <candrecn@gmail.com>
Cc: nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, Steve Dickson <steved@redhat.com>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>,
NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: AutoFS+NFSv4 server down = LOOOOONG timeout.
Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 09:42:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A7BCCCA.4020307@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f6ce31e30908061718u2c527e2eo5cf35f6eb0800fd4@mail.gmail.com>
On Aug. 07, 2009, 3:18 +0300, Carlos André <candrecn@gmail.com> wrote:
> Anyone ?
>
> 2009/7/29 Carlos André <candrecn@gmail.com>:
>> PPL, I need put a CentOS 5.3 (updated) NFSv4 server to work with Kerberos
>> and AutoFS, but i got a problem: If NFS server goes down i get a LOOOOOOONG
>> mount timeout on CentOS 5.3 (updated) NFSv4 client...
>>
>> Since i need mount some (3 to 6) dirs at user logon process, if mount hangs,
>> user logon hangs. Then i want configure it to timeout (if server down) after
>> 10-15 secs (MAX) on each mount attempt.
>>
>> I already make a lab and tried a LOT of combinations, there my findings
>> (server DOWN IP: 172.16.0.10 / client IP: 172.16.1.10) using basic command
>> (time mount 172.16.0.10:/remotedir /localdir/ -t nfs4 -o
>> sec=krb5,proto=<tcp/udp>) from NFS client:
>>
>> - Once i try access mount point using AutoFS (proto=tcp OR proto=udp) it
>> hangs for 189 secs (3m9s: real 3m9.001s) until show error (mount: mount to
>> NFS server '172.16.0.10' failed: timed out (giving up))
Sounds like you're hitting the server's grace period.
You can try hacking it in /etc/init.d/nfs
by adding
echo 15 > /proc/fs/nfsd/nfsv4leasetime
before
daemon rpc.nfsd $RPCNFSDARGS $RPCNFSDCOUNT
Then, look at your /var/log/messages file for
NFSD: starting 15-second grace period
That said, I'm not sure why it can't be passed as a command line
option to the nfsd daemon and controlled via RPCNFSDARGS
in /etc/sysconfig/nfs
Benny
>>
>> Mounting manually using NFSv4 i got same timeouts of AutoFS.
>>
>> The only way to get a lower timeout value is using only proto=udp,retry=0
>> (not using sec=krb5) any another combination i get 3m9s (sec=krb5,proto=tcp
>>
>>
>> I tried change another NFS mount options putting a lower value (timeo,
>> retrans, retry), and they only change something then i use NFSv3 with
>> proto=udp. But i want NFSv4/TCP (coz Kerberos) and a timeout lower then 15
>> secs... :(
>>
>> I'm using these packages (server and client side):
>> autofs-5.0.1-0.rc2.102.el5_3.1
>> nfs-utils-1.0.9-40.el5
>> kernel-2.6.18-128.1.16.el5
>>
>> The only way to resolve this behavior is changing the source code? There's
>> no way to lower timeout with NFSv4/TCP in this case ?
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NFSv4 mailing list
> NFSv4@linux-nfs.org
> http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
next parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-07 6:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <f6ce31e30907291021p769d8bb7jb7a13d0370b87bd6@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <f6ce31e30908061718u2c527e2eo5cf35f6eb0800fd4@mail.gmail.com>
2009-08-07 6:42 ` Benny Halevy [this message]
2009-08-07 14:04 ` AutoFS+NFSv4 server down = LOOOOONG timeout J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-10 18:29 ` Carlos André
2009-08-10 19:18 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-10 19:43 ` Carlos André
2009-08-10 20:05 ` Carlos André
2009-08-10 20:35 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-11 12:41 ` Carlos André
2009-08-11 20:00 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-12 2:37 ` Carlos André
2009-08-12 14:27 ` Ian Kent
2009-08-12 14:13 ` Ian Kent
2009-08-12 15:00 ` Carlos André
2009-08-12 15:20 ` Ian Kent
2009-08-12 16:40 ` Carlos André
2009-08-13 14:19 ` Ian Kent
2009-08-13 14:43 ` Carlos André
2009-08-13 15:18 ` Carlos André
2009-08-18 0:30 ` Ian Kent
2009-08-18 13:17 ` Chuck Lever
[not found] ` <1250555418.16878.7.camel-oPQCyYhPoviaaDTPkt0SUw@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-24 13:27 ` Carlos André
[not found] ` <f6ce31e30908240627gff0a7eeu3c884185e6324518-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-24 14:57 ` Ian Kent
2009-08-24 18:07 ` Carlos André
2009-08-27 8:54 ` Ian Kent
2009-08-27 14:38 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-27 14:52 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-08-27 14:54 ` Chuck Lever
2009-08-27 15:00 ` Trond Myklebust
2009-08-27 15:12 ` Chuck Lever
2009-09-17 12:58 ` Carlos André
2009-09-17 13:12 ` Ondrej Valousek
2009-09-22 5:46 ` Ian Kent
2009-09-22 17:52 ` Carlos André
2009-08-10 20:11 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A7BCCCA.4020307@panasas.com \
--to=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
--cc=candrecn@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=steved@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox