From: Peter Staubach <staubach@redhat.com>
To: Shehjar Tikoo <shehjart-+FkPdpiNhgJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Reference to file size in nfsd_create_v3
Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2009 09:38:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A953AE6.1030800@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A94DFDA.4040508-+FkPdpiNhgJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
> J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 02:40:12PM +0530, Shehjar Tikoo wrote:
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>> I am looking at the fs/nfsd/vfs.c:nfsd_create_v3 function. In
>>> there, a comment says: "furthermore, if the size is nonzero, we
>>> should ignore it according to spec!"
>>>
>>> Could someone please point out the section in RFC1813 where this
>>> particular point is specified?
>>
>> It's referring to the third paragraph of the DESCRIPTION section of
>> the OPEN operation (14.2.16) in rfc 3530.
>>
>> --b.
> Ok.
>
> For NFSv3, is there a specified way to handle create or mkdir ops where
> the size is non-zero? The reason this came up is that I was testing
> unfs3 with SpecSFS2k8 and an MKDIR op failed in unfs3 because SFS sent
> the mkdir call with non-zero size in the attributes. I just wanted to
> see how Linux nfsd handled it.
>
Most servers in the market just ignore the size field for
MKDIR requests. They also ignore the size field, unless it is
0, for CREATE requests.
Setting the size on a directory does not make sense and the
usual decision point for file creation is whether to truncate
the file to empty or not.
ps
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-26 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-26 9:10 Reference to file size in nfsd_create_v3 Shehjar Tikoo
[not found] ` <4A449074.6060600-+FkPdpiNhgJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-25 16:18 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-26 7:10 ` Shehjar Tikoo
[not found] ` <4A94DFDA.4040508-+FkPdpiNhgJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
2009-08-26 13:38 ` Peter Staubach [this message]
2009-08-26 16:04 ` J. Bruce Fields
2009-08-27 6:19 ` Shehjar Tikoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A953AE6.1030800@redhat.com \
--to=staubach@redhat.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shehjart-+FkPdpiNhgJBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).