From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Dickson Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Enable v4 mounts when either "nfsvers=4" or "vers=4" option are set (vers-02) Date: Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:53:01 -0400 Message-ID: <4A980B6D.4010306@RedHat.com> References: <23199F1A-EA23-4DE1-AAB8-92D4B508C865@oracle.com> <4A956BF2.6000902@RedHat.com> <4A95760C.9000604@RedHat.com> <1251316764.5226.21.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <4A9694D2.2030205@RedHat.com> <4A4EE1FA-209C-44D3-B418-96ABC18F9E3D@oracle.com> <20090828161256.GA2859@infradead.org> <4A980751.7070206@RedHat.com> <20090828164154.GB9951@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Cc: Linux NFS Mailing list , Linux NFSv4 mailing list To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20090828164154.GB9951@infradead.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org Errors-To: nfsv4-bounces@linux-nfs.org List-ID: On 08/28/2009 12:41 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:35:29PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >> Question... How are will it be to back out of this? Meaning the >> kernel tries a v4 mount only to see the server does not support v4 >> or for some other recoverable error and then has to restart back >> down the mount NFS again... This is very fairly trivial in user space... > > Same as we do now? Yes... > As soon as it doesn't work return an error, unwind > and return to userspace? Then why not simply stay in user space? steved.