From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Steve Dickson Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Support "-t nfs,vers=4" mounts in the kernel [take 4] Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:14:43 -0400 Message-ID: <4AA7F093.4030902@RedHat.com> References: <20090902135032.3550.23170.stgit@matisse.1015granger.net> <4AA6A7B5.1060301@RedHat.com> <1252517471.8722.19.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Chuck Lever , linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org To: Trond Myklebust Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13213 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753628AbZIISP1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Sep 2009 14:15:27 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1252517471.8722.19.camel-rJ7iovZKK19ZJLDQqaL3InhyD016LWXt@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 09/09/2009 01:31 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 14:51 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >> On 09/02/2009 09:51 AM, Chuck Lever wrote: >>> Sorry for the repost. After reading the patch descriptions again, I >>> thought they needed some clarification. >>> >>> --- >>> >>> Chuck Lever (4): >>> NFS: Allow the "nfs" file system type to support NFSv4 >>> NFS: Move details of nfs4_get_sb() to a helper >>> NFS: Refactor NFSv4 text-based mount option validation >>> NFS: Mount option parser should detect missing "port=" >>> >>> >>> fs/nfs/internal.h | 10 ++ >>> fs/nfs/super.c | 202 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------- >>> include/linux/nfs4.h | 1 >>> 3 files changed, 144 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-) >>> >> Trond, >> >> I'm updating the mount.nfs man pages, and would like give >> an guess-ta-mate as to which kernel these patches will be in. >> Any ideas? > > I'm planning on pushing them out in the upcoming merge window, since the > patches themselves seem pretty straightforward. I've applied the fixes > that I suggested, and added the patch to disable vers!=4 in the '-t > nfs4' case. > > If you'd like to test it all out, I've pushed those patches into the > nfs-for-2.6.32 branch of my git tree. They should also appear in > linux-next. Cool... thanks! steved.