linux-nfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Haynes <Thomas.Haynes-UdXhSnd/wVw@public.gmane.org>
To: Jon Forrest <jlforrest-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: To Automount or to Not Automount?
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 14:58:29 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B4F8575.1010505@sun.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <hint4t$gjt$1@ger.gmane.org>

Jon Forrest wrote:
>
> So, I'd like to ask the NFS experts on this
> list whether in a CentOS 5 environment with
> NFS3 mounts over a functional private network,
> would using static mounts result in any negatives
> as compared to automounts. I'm especially interested
> in overhead on the NFS server.
>
> Cordially,

Is every node mounting every other node?

Or are you talking about every node mounting a central
server?

The static mounts would happen on boot and you might
have issues if every node was trying to mount every other
node. With automounts, you would delay the mounting
until the booting node has to access the other node.

I had this issue way back in 1998 with a Beowulf
cluster.  Heating issues forced me to shut down all
of the nodes at the same time and the interdependencies
in the mounts caused the bringup to be slow. :->

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-14 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-14 20:00 To Automount or to Not Automount? Jon Forrest
2010-01-14 20:58 ` Thomas Haynes [this message]
     [not found]   ` <4B4F8575.1010505-xsfywfwIY+M@public.gmane.org>
2010-01-14 21:15     ` Jon Forrest
2010-01-14 22:07       ` Trond Myklebust

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B4F8575.1010505@sun.com \
    --to=thomas.haynes-udxhsnd/wvw@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=jlforrest-TVLZxgkOlNX2fBVCVOL8/A@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).