From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Cc: steved@redhat.com, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mount.nfs: set the default family for lookups based on Defaultproto= setting
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 12:13:08 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B6C51A4.3070005@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100205113052.333f0c05-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
Hi Jeff-
On 02/05/2010 11:30 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:31:28 -0500
> Chuck Lever<chuck.lever@oracle.com> wrote:
>
>> On 02/05/2010 09:27 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
>>> When IPv6 is enabled, the Proto= config file option is treated as a
>>> netid, and the address family for lookups is selected based on that
>>> setting. The Defaultproto= option however still only affects the
>>> protocol setting for the sockets (IPPROTO_*) and not the address family.
>>>
>>> This patch makes it so that if someone sets the "Defaultproto=" option
>>> in the nfsmount.conf, it's used to determine the default address family
>>> for lookups as well as the protocol type.
>>>
>>> This gives users a way to force a particular address family to be used
>>> universally for mounts and brings the behavior of the Defaultproto=
>>> option in line with the Proto= option.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton<jlayton@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> utils/mount/configfile.c | 8 ++++++++
>>> utils/mount/network.c | 18 ++++++++----------
>>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/utils/mount/configfile.c b/utils/mount/configfile.c
>>> index 6843098..71d3627 100644
>>> --- a/utils/mount/configfile.c
>>> +++ b/utils/mount/configfile.c
>>> @@ -221,6 +221,8 @@ int inline check_vers(char *mopt, char *field)
>>>
>>> unsigned long config_default_vers;
>>> unsigned long config_default_proto;
>>> +extern sa_family_t config_default_family;
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * Check to see if a default value is being set.
>>> * If so, set the appropriate global value which will
>>> @@ -242,6 +244,12 @@ int inline default_value(char *mopt)
>>> xlog_warn("Unable to set default protocol : %s",
>>> strerror(errno));
>>> }
>>> +#ifdef IPV6_SUPPORTED
>>> + if (!nfs_nfs_proto_family(options,&config_default_family)) {
>>> + xlog_warn("Unable to set default family : %s",
>>> + strerror(errno));
>>> + }
>>> +#endif
>>
>> Maybe you don't need the #ifdef here?
>>
>> Aside from making the code more readable, removing the #ifdef would also
>> make it so the same code path is followed whether IPv6 is supported or
>> not, which makes testing easier.
>>
>> Just a thought.
>>
>
> They probably aren't essential. It all comes down to what we want the
> behavior to be in the following situation:
OK... I had thought the behavior would be the same with and without the
#ifdef's. Since it clearly doesn't work the same way in both cases,
that's a sure sign that we will have testing and documentation problems
here if the #ifdef is left in.
> If someone had a TIRPC enabled nfs-utils but IPv6 support is disabled,
> and then set Defaultproto=tcp6.
>
> With the ifdef's in place, then the address family part of it would
> just be ignored. Without those in place, IPv6 will be forced for the
> lookup but we won't actually be able to make use of the addresses
> returned.
As an admin (who understands how netids work), I would be more surprised
if setting the default protocol (netid, really) to tcp6, and then
disabling IPv6 on the client, or at build time in nfs-utils, or if the
IPv6-related netids were missing from /etc/netconfig, would work at all.
It would be more consistent behaviour IMO to make this case fail.
I agree with having things "just work" in reasonable cases, but it seems
like we are bending the semantics of netids and proto= to make that happen.
"tcp6" does not mean "use IPv6 if it's available." It means "always use
IPv6." And, "tcp" does not mean "use TCP on either IPv4 or IPv6," it
now means "always use TCP on IPv4." This is what we buy with netids and
TI-RPC. That's why we use HAVE_LIBTIRPC rather than IPV6_SUPPORTED in
nfs_nfs_proto_family and nfs_mount_proto_family.
> Granted, it's a bit of a pathological setup, but I don't think the
> #ifdef's here really take away anything and may help prevent confusion
> with the union of all these different options.
>
>>> } else {
>>> xlog_warn("Unable to alloc memory for default protocol");
>>> }
>>> diff --git a/utils/mount/network.c b/utils/mount/network.c
>>> index 92bba2d..0ab3bb1 100644
>>> --- a/utils/mount/network.c
>>> +++ b/utils/mount/network.c
>>> @@ -1331,6 +1331,12 @@ nfs_nfs_port(struct mount_options *options, unsigned long *port)
>>> return 1;
>>> }
>>>
>>> +#ifdef IPV6_SUPPORTED
By the above argument, this should be HAVE_LIBTIRPC.
>>> +sa_family_t config_default_family = AF_UNSPEC;
>>> +#else
>>> +sa_family_t config_default_family = AF_INET;
>>> +#endif
>>> +
>>> /*
>>> * Returns TRUE and fills in @family if a valid NFS protocol option
>>> * is found, or FALSE if the option was specified with an invalid value.
>>> @@ -1341,11 +1347,7 @@ int nfs_nfs_proto_family(struct mount_options *options,
>>> unsigned long protocol;
>>> char *option;
>>>
>>> -#ifdef IPV6_SUPPORTED
>>> - *family = AF_UNSPEC;
>>> -#else
>>> - *family = AF_INET;
>>> -#endif
>>> + *family = config_default_family;
>>>
>>> switch (po_rightmost(options, nfs_transport_opttbl)) {
>>> case 0: /* udp */
>>> @@ -1488,11 +1490,7 @@ int nfs_mount_proto_family(struct mount_options *options,
>>> unsigned long protocol;
>>> char *option;
>>>
>>> -#ifdef HAVE_LIBTIRPC
>>> - *family = AF_UNSPEC;
>>> -#else
>>> - *family = AF_INET;
>>> -#endif
>>> + *family = config_default_family;
>>>
>>> option = po_get(options, "mountproto");
>>> if (option != NULL)
>>
>>
>
>
--
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-05 17:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-05 14:27 [PATCH] mount.nfs: set the default family for lookups based on Defaultproto= setting Jeff Layton
2010-02-05 15:31 ` Chuck Lever
2010-02-05 16:30 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20100205113052.333f0c05-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-05 17:13 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2010-02-05 17:43 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20100205124340.6b77902c-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-05 18:11 ` Chuck Lever
2010-02-05 18:17 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20100205131757.6fd224d0-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-05 19:55 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20100205145530.61634593-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-05 19:59 ` Chuck Lever
2010-02-05 20:05 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20100205150511.5e18538f-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-05 20:25 ` Chuck Lever
2010-02-05 21:20 ` Jeff Layton
[not found] ` <20100205162018.41ea79d8-9yPaYZwiELC+kQycOl6kW4xkIHaj4LzF@public.gmane.org>
2010-02-05 21:28 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B6C51A4.3070005@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=steved@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox