From: Daniel Goering <g_daniel@gmx.net>
To: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: background mounts inconsistent and partly not usable
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 18:52:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7ADB6B.7090709@localhost> (raw)
Hi!
I'd like to mount an NFS4 share with the option bg as described in man 5
nfs. But all mounts are carried out in the foreground and time out after
2 minutes [and the client is blocked e.g. during boot for the entire
time] instead of trying in the background for about 1 week until the
server is back up.
When I try to mount a share from an unreachable server I get something like
# mount.nfs4 10.1.2.3:/ /mnt/ -v -o bg
mount.nfs4: text-based options: 'bg,clientaddr=xxx,addr=10.1.2.3'
mount.nfs4: mount(2): Input/output error
mount.nfs4: mount system call failed
I tracked this down to utils/mount/stropts.c, where the function
nfs_is_permanent_error maps EIO to an permanent error and prevents the
mount from backgrounding.
I changed utils/mount/mount.c to use the old non string mount, in order
to compare the results
--- mount.c.bak 2010-02-16 18:06:09.000000000 +0100
+++ mount.c 2010-02-16 18:06:12.000000000 +0100
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
if (nfs_mount_data_version > NFS_MOUNT_VERSION)
nfs_mount_data_version = NFS_MOUNT_VERSION;
else
- if (kernel_version > MAKE_VERSION(2, 6, 22))
+ if (kernel_version > MAKE_VERSION(3, 6, 22))
string++;
}
and I get this result, if there is no route to the host
# mount.nfs4 10.1.2.3:/ /mnt/ -v -o bg
mount.nfs4: pinging: prog 100003 vers 4 prot tcp port 2049
mount.nfs4: Unable to connect to 10.1.2.3:2049, errno 113 (No route to host)
instead of waiting 2 minutes this call immediately returns. If there is
just no answer from the host instead of a "no route to host" message, I get
# mount.nfs4 10.1.2.3:/ /mnt/ -v -o bg
mount.nfs4: pinging: prog 100003 vers 4 prot tcp port 2049
mount.nfs4: Unable to connect to 10.1.2.3:2049, errno 110 (Connection
timed out)
mount.nfs4: backgrounding "10.1.2.3:/"
Both calls to the old non-string mount are significantly faster, and the
last one even backgrounds, while the string mount gives EIO in both
cases and never backgrounds.
I'd like to use the bg option to be able to boot the clients
simultaneously with the servers and the clients should just mount the
share, as soon as it becomes available.
Currently this is never possible with any machine running a kernel newer
than 2.6.22, as they will all die of the EIO error. Even for an older
Kernel this is only possible, if the server is already booting and can
answer ARP requests, as otherwise the mount will die from the "no route
to host" message.
I'd prefer if mount tried to find a route for about one week, to have
some time to turn on the servers separately [so they can spin up their
RAIDs sequentially instead of burning the fuse by consuming lots of
power during simultaneous spin up], but may be there are good reasons to
have it differently.
Nevertheless I think that it should at least be possible to mount shares
in the background after a timeout for systems with recent kernels using
string mount.
I observed the given problems with the following systems:
Gentoo Kernel 2.6.31.4 nfs-utils 1.1.4
Gentoo Kernel 2.6.31.4 nfs-utils 1.2.1
Fedora 12 Kernel 2.6.31.12 nfs-utils 1.2.1
For now I'll probably just patch nfs_is_permanent_error on all my
systems to just map everything to temporary, but I hope there is a more
robust solution, that will allow fast feedback on problems and still
support background mounts.
Cheers
Daniel
next reply other threads:[~2010-02-16 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-16 17:52 Daniel Goering [this message]
2010-02-16 17:54 ` background mounts inconsistent and partly not usable Chuck Lever
2010-02-16 19:21 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B7ADB6B.7090709@localhost \
--to=g_daniel@gmx.net \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox