From: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Cc: "Trond.Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
NFSv3 list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] SUNRPC connect timeout case network request delay
Date: Mon, 08 Mar 2010 17:59:15 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B94CA73.90600@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4B8FE6C7.2090207@oracle.com>
Hi chuck,
Thanks for your reply.
Chuck Lever =E5=86=99=E9=81=93:
> On 03/04/2010 05:12 AM, Mi Jinlong wrote:
>> Hi,
>> Step4: [22:42:16] Write data to file
>> [22:42:16] Write data success
>> Step5: [22:42:16] Unlock file
>> [22:46:30] Unlock file success.
>> Step6: [22:46:30] Close file /mnt/nfs/file
>> [22:46:30] Close fiel /mnt/nfs/file success
>>
>> The problem is at step5, unlock file takes 4 min, it's a long time
>> than expected.
>> When traceing the kernel, I find SUNRPC call call_connect timeout ma=
ny
>> times,
>> one timeout is 1min.
>=20
> The kernel's TCP reconnect logic will retry until it succeeds, withou=
t
> letting the upper level make progress. For some reason, it is having
> difficulty reconnecting with your server.
>=20
>> I think it's a problem of kernel, but i don't know why, can someone
>> help me ?
>=20
> # sudo rpcdebug -m rpc -s xprt trans
After running this command, I got some important messages that I think=
=2E
RPC: xs_connect delayed xprt for 3 seconds
...
RPC: xs_connect delayed xprt for 6 seconds
...
RPC: xs_connect delayed xprt for 12 seconds
...
RPC: xs_connect delayed xprt for 24 seconds
...
...
RPC: xs_connect delayed xprt for 300 seconds
=20
This message is printed at xs_connect, and the delay time is double the=
re.
IMO, when some data translate over through a socket, the socket should =
be released.
But, it seems the socket isn't released through those messages above.=20
Is it wrong, or there are some other reasons ?
At the latest kernel, this bug was fix by patch
"NFS/RPC: fix problems with reestablish_timeout and related code."
But I don't sure about this.
thanks,
Mi Jinlong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-08 9:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-04 10:12 [RFC] SUNRPC connect timeout case network request delay Mi Jinlong
2010-03-04 16:58 ` Chuck Lever
2010-03-08 9:59 ` Mi Jinlong [this message]
2010-03-08 15:40 ` Chuck Lever
2010-03-12 9:55 ` Mi Jinlong
2010-03-12 13:35 ` Trond Myklebust
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B94CA73.90600@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox