From: Mi Jinlong <mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: "Trond.Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>,
NFSv3 list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] Should lockd get into grace_period when statd start but not stop?
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:22:35 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B9772EB.9010909@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
Hi,
When using command "service nfslock stop" and "service nfsklock start"
to restart the nfslock service at RHEL with kernel 2.6.31, if start the service
after stop it more than the grace_period time, lock which lockd get before
cann't be reclaimed for the grace_period is timeout.
So, IMO, the lockd should get into grace_period when statd start not stop?
Some code at kernel: fs/lockd/svclock.c
....
411 if (locks_in_grace() && !reclaim) {
412 ret = nlm_lck_denied_grace_period;
413 goto out;
414 }
415 if (reclaim && !locks_in_grace()) {
416 ret = nlm_lck_denied_grace_period;
417 goto out;
418 }
....
I think it can implement it like that:
1) When statd stop, it send a KILL signal to lockd,
and lockd only release the lock, but don't get into grace_period.
2) When statd start, it send one some other signal to lockd,
and lockd only get into grace_period. The lock will be reclaimed.
thanks,
Mi Jinlong
next reply other threads:[~2010-03-10 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-10 10:22 Mi Jinlong [this message]
2010-03-10 18:24 ` [RFC] Should lockd get into grace_period when statd start but not stop? J. Bruce Fields
2010-03-11 1:02 ` Mi Jinlong
2010-03-11 15:58 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-03-12 9:42 ` Mi Jinlong
2010-03-12 23:08 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-03-16 10:05 ` Mi Jinlong
2010-03-16 16:56 ` J. Bruce Fields
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B9772EB.9010909@cn.fujitsu.com \
--to=mijinlong@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox