public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Kevin Coffman <kwc@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] Try to use kernel function to determine supported Kerberos enctypes.
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 07:58:56 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BC6FF80.80506@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <z2j4d569c331004141258y2f16a82ga1aa7826d665b3a9@mail.gmail.com>

Hey Kevin,

On 04/14/2010 03:58 PM, Kevin Coffman wrote:
> 
> The global krb5_enctypes array was used when the list was being read
> once from a file.  With the list now coming up with each request in
> the updated upcall, I think the list obtained in the upcall should be
> added to the clnt_info structure and then passed to the
> limit_krb5_enctypes function as a parameter.
I took a look at move the krb5_enctypes array in to the clnt_info structure
and I'm thinking it might be better to keep it as global variable. 
Here is my reasoning... 

The "enctypes=" string that comes up in the upcall is basically a 
static string. Yeah I know it could change but that's highly unlikely
any time soon. So if we put the krb5_enctypes array in the clnt_info
structure we would have to parse that (static) string on *every* upcall,
since the clnt_info structures are dynamically allocated. So
parsing a static string on every upcall does not make sense to me.

Keeping the supported enctypes in a global variable allow us to
parse the string once and when it changes (which will never happen
dynamically). So if the first enctypes values are cached, all that
parsing become a simple strcmp()... ala:
 
+parse_enctypes(char *enctypes)
+{
+	int n = 0;
+	char *curr, *comma;
+	int i;
+	static char *cached_types;
+
+	if (cached_types && strcmp(cached_types, enctypes) == 0)
+		return 0;


Makes sense? Am I missing something??

steved.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-04-15 11:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-14 19:18 [PATCH 0/3] nfs-utils: Adds support for more encryption types steved
2010-04-14 19:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] gssd: move function limit_krb5_enctypes into the exported functions area steved
2010-04-14 19:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] Try to use kernel function to determine supported Kerberos enctypes steved
2010-04-14 19:58   ` Kevin Coffman
     [not found]     ` <z2j4d569c331004141258y2f16a82ga1aa7826d665b3a9-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-14 20:05       ` Steve Dickson
2010-04-15 11:58     ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2010-04-15 13:25       ` Kevin Coffman
2010-04-15 12:45   ` [PATCH 2/3] Try to use kernel function to determine supported Kerberos enctypes (Updated) Steve Dickson
2010-04-14 19:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] Add support for non-DES encryption types steved
2010-04-16 17:53 ` [PATCH 0/3] nfs-utils: Adds support for more " Steve Dickson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BC6FF80.80506@RedHat.com \
    --to=steved@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwc@citi.umich.edu \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox