From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh-nopoi9nDyk+ELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mount.nfs4 hangs when rpcbind is not reachable
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:03:56 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD1C4EC.8050404@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.01.1004231750380.20942-SHaQjdQMGhDmsUXKMKRlFA@public.gmane.org>
On 04/23/2010 11:53 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Friday 2010-04-23 17:32, Chuck Lever wrote:
>> On 04/23/2010 11:18 AM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>>>
>>> I just noticed that in a diskless-system initramfs, mount.nfs4 appears
>>> to hang whenever it cannot get a response (any response) from the
>>> rpcbind port. If there is no rpcbind running and thus, TCP RST is sent,
>>> fine. But if it's dropped, like when the "lo" device is not in the "up"
>>> state (as can easily happen at this stage of boot), mount.nfs4 waits
>>> forever.
>>
>> The rpcbind registration RPC request is "hard". Maybe it should be "soft".
>>
>> But a better question is why are you doing an NFS mount if "lo" is not up?
>
> Don't ask me. When the kernel has started, lo is in the down state, and
> does not have any addresses assigned either. Distros have to currently
> do that themselves - usually only after the root filesystem has been
> moutned. I just ran into and reported that issue where lo is down the
> entire initramfs time. Needless to say NFSv3 has no problems with lo
> being down.
... that we know of. I don't think statd and lockd would work in this
case, but I've never tried it.
NFSv4 mount backgrounding hasn't worked until recently either, fwiw.
>> NFS has never worked in this case, because there would be no way for
>> the kernel to communicate with user space.
>
> Netlink and ioctls work without lo ;-)
Sure, but RPC doesn't go over ioctls :-)
> In fact, you'd be surprised how much of Linux works without an enabled
> lo device. Part of it may be because eth0 is up and has an address that
> can be used to do loopbacking ('local 192.168.1.15 dev eth0 proto
> kernel scope host src 192.168.1.15' in `ip route list table local`).
So, one way to address this would be if kernel_connect() returns a
distinctive errno in this case (I would expect something like ENETDOWN)
and then have the RPC transport behave as if it had received ECONNREFUSED.
Are you in a position to enable RPC debugging before doing that mount?
If so, you can do
# rpcdebug -m rpc -s trans
or, if rpcdebug isn't available, try
# echo 128 > /proc/sys/sunrpc/rpc_debug
then try the mount. Look in /var/log/messages for the debugging messages.
If not, I'll have to find a way to try it here.
--
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-23 16:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-23 15:18 mount.nfs4 hangs when rpcbind is not reachable Jan Engelhardt
[not found] ` <alpine.LSU.2.01.1004231717180.2242-SHaQjdQMGhDmsUXKMKRlFA@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-23 15:32 ` Chuck Lever
2010-04-23 15:53 ` Jan Engelhardt
[not found] ` <alpine.LSU.2.01.1004231750380.20942-SHaQjdQMGhDmsUXKMKRlFA@public.gmane.org>
2010-04-23 16:03 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
2010-04-23 16:25 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-23 17:00 ` Chuck Lever
2010-04-23 17:39 ` Jan Engelhardt
2010-04-23 18:04 ` Chuck Lever
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BD1C4EC.8050404@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=jengelh-nopoi9nDyk+ELgA04lAiVw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).