public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steve Dickson <SteveD@redhat.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Linux NFS Mailing list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NFS client send out of order offsets....
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:26:42 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BD21EA2.9040502@RedHat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1272060583.3019.11.camel@localhost.localdomain>



On 04/23/2010 06:09 PM, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 17:56 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: 
>> Hey Trond (and all),
>>
>> It been brought to my attention that Linux NFS clients, with big-ish 
>> writes (8GB and above), quickly started sending out writes with
>> out-of-order offsets... Meaning in the start of an 8GB write a 7GB offset 
>> will be send and then smaller offsets, closer to the the beginning 
>> of the file, will follow.
>>
>> Now I realize this is perfectly fine from a protocol standpoint and (w/out 
>> any on hands investigation) pretty sure it has to do with how pages are
>> being kicked out of the cache (i.e. memory pressure), meaning is 
>> not an NFS issue at all...  but... 
>>
>> It was also point out to me that this type of out of order-ness does 
>> not happen with Solaris clients and with an AIX clients there is some 
>> mount option fix out of order-ness... 
>>
>> So my question is there some way to tweak the client to ensure
>> offset are send sequential order... 
>>
>> Note this happening on a older kernel, so before I go off  and 
>> "re-invent the wheel", I was wonder if other people have seen this
>> issue and has it been addressed... 
>>
>> tia,
>>
>> steved.
> 
> The NFS layer will always write out pages in order whenever it initiates
> a flush.
> 
> The problem here is the VM's use of the 'range_cyclic' writeback control
> option in functions like 'balance_dirty_pages()' and in the kflush
> daemons.
> That neither can nor should be fixed in the NFS layer. It really needs
> to be addressed in the VM.
> 
Understood... completely.... 

But I wonder if there some vm tweak (via sysctl) that would
give a better chance of having things go out in order...

steved.



  reply	other threads:[~2010-04-23 22:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-04-23 21:56 NFS client send out of order offsets Steve Dickson
2010-04-23 22:09 ` Trond Myklebust
2010-04-23 22:26   ` Steve Dickson [this message]
2010-04-24  8:40 ` Bathie, Jon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BD21EA2.9040502@RedHat.com \
    --to=steved@redhat.com \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox