public inbox for linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Cc: NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] nfsd4: keep the client from expiring while in use by nfs41 compounds
Date: Sun, 09 May 2010 09:30:31 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BE65687.8050806@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100507223836.GO19142@fieldses.org>

On May. 08, 2010, 1:38 +0300, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 01:37:34AM +0300, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> Bruce,
>>
>> The following patchset changes the scope of the sessionid spin lock
>> to cover both sessions and the client lru list and it introduces a
>> new reference count on the client that's manipulated under that new
>> client lock (not requiring the state mutex).
>>
>> It's tested to pass connectathon tests as well as explicit session destroy
>> and implicit client expiry when the client is blown away.
>> However, I haven't tested the gist of this patchset which is to get
>> the client to perform a long enough compound during which it might time out...
> 
> Yeah, I'm not sure how to test that.  Create a temporary patch
> introducign a "delay X seconds" compound op, then teach pynfs to send
> those timed to coincide with client-reboot exchangeid's or the end of a
> client lease?

That should do for a one time test.
For regression testing I think we need a better way of injecting
a timeout longer than the lease period.

> 
> So if I understand the intention of these patches right: behavior in the
> case of something explicitly destroys a client (e.g. client-rebooting
> exchangeid) is to partially destroy the client, but allow any concurrent
> compound to attempt to continue processing with the near-dead client?
> 

Correct.  The intentions are:
1. Make the laundromat process ignore clients that are in
use by a 4.1 session.
2. Renew the client when the compound ends, rather than when it begins.
3. Unhash the client when it's expired explicitly but don't destroy it
until there's no reference to it.

>> [PATCH 1/8] nfsd4: rename sessionid_lock to client_lock
>> [PATCH 2/8] nfsd4: fold release_session into expire_client
>> [PATCH 3/8] nfsd4: use list_move in move_to_confirmed
>> [PATCH 4/8] nfsd4: extend the client_lock to cover cl_lru
>> [PATCH 5/8] nfsd4: refactor expire_client
>> [PATCH 6/8] nfsd4: introduce nfs4_client.cl_refcount
>> [PATCH 7/8] nfsd4: keep a reference count on client while in use
>>
>> [PATCH 8/8] nfsd41: cstate->session can NULL in nfsd4_destroy_session
>> I think this was introduced in: 26c0c75 nfsd4: fix unlikely race in session replay case
>> though I'm not sure how it ever worked correctly...
> 
> Me neither.  I've got a similar patch in my tree.

Heh, I see.
5d4cec2 nfsd4: fix bare destroy_session null dereference

Benny

> 
> --b.
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


  reply	other threads:[~2010-05-09  6:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-05-04 22:37 [PATCH 0/8] nfsd4: keep the client from expiring while in use by nfs41 compounds Benny Halevy
2010-05-04 22:43 ` [PATCH 1/8] nfsd4: rename sessionid_lock to client_lock Benny Halevy
2010-05-04 22:43 ` [PATCH 2/8] nfsd4: fold release_session into expire_client Benny Halevy
2010-05-04 22:44 ` [PATCH 3/8] nfsd4: use list_move in move_to_confirmed Benny Halevy
2010-05-04 22:44 ` [PATCH 4/8] nfsd4: extend the client_lock to cover cl_lru Benny Halevy
2010-05-07 22:29   `  J. Bruce Fields
2010-05-09  6:18     ` Benny Halevy
2010-05-04 22:44 ` [PATCH 5/8] nfsd4: refactor expire_client Benny Halevy
2010-05-04 22:44 ` [PATCH 6/8] nfsd4: introduce nfs4_client.cl_refcount Benny Halevy
2010-05-04 22:44 ` [PATCH 7/8] nfsd4: keep a reference count on client while in use Benny Halevy
2010-05-04 22:45 ` [PATCH 8/8] nfsd41: cstate->session can NULL in nfsd4_destroy_session Benny Halevy
2010-05-07 22:38 ` [PATCH 0/8] nfsd4: keep the client from expiring while in use by nfs41 compounds J. Bruce Fields
2010-05-09  6:30   ` Benny Halevy [this message]
2010-05-09 16:55     ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-05-10 14:15       ` Benny Halevy
2010-05-10 19:01         ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-05-11  7:27           ` Benny Halevy
2010-05-11 14:39             ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-05-11 16:05               ` J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4BE65687.8050806@panasas.com \
    --to=bhalevy@panasas.com \
    --cc=bfields@citi.umich.edu \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox