From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: Staubach_Peter@emc.com
Cc: bharrosh@panasas.com, osd-dev@open-osd.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] SQUASHME: pnfs-obj: panlayout: Fix very old BUG_ONs on ol_state.status
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 19:31:49 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4BFE9E75.1020307@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BF3BB6D12298F54B89C8DCC1E4073D80F2C566-1Zg0zMUlrbd9m/dOYFj4Yjjd7nCn89gW@public.gmane.org>
On May. 27, 2010, 18:26 +0300, <Staubach_Peter@emc.com> wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Boaz Harrosh
> Sent: Thursday, May 27, 2010 10:52 AM
> To: Benny Halevy; open-osd; NFS list
> Subject: [PATCH] SQUASHME: pnfs-obj: panlayout: Fix very old BUG_ONs on ol_state.status
>
>
> OK This is definitely my stupidity when converting panfs_shim to the
> new objlayout_read/write_done() API. But that was very, very long
> time ago. Did we not test panlayout since then.
>
> So I fixed the stale check on ol_state.status which is never set
> until much later inside the call to generic layer.
>
> While at it I converted the BUG_ONs to WARN_ONs because it could
> be data corruption but otherwise it will not crush the Kernel.
> Better continue to be able to debug it better. (And added missing
> information to the WARN_ON)
>
> Congratulation, I've successfully ran all tests over
> panfs-export/panfs_shim over real Panasas HW. With latest code.
> [ This is with the new panfs-export that is also compatible with
> the std objects layout driver. Patches to that will follow]
>
> TODO:
> I should also simulate/cause some IO errors and see that
> errors are reported at layout_return
>
> Signed-off-by: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
> ---
> fs/nfs/objlayout/panfs_shim.c | 19 +++++++++++++------
> 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/objlayout/panfs_shim.c b/fs/nfs/objlayout/panfs_shim.c
> index 414831e..c34fb5c 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/objlayout/panfs_shim.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/objlayout/panfs_shim.c
> @@ -421,9 +421,12 @@ panfs_shim_read_done(
> rc = res_p->result;
> if (rc == PAN_SUCCESS) {
> status = res_p->length;
> - BUG_ON(state->ol_state.status < 0);
> - BUG_ON((pan_stor_len_t)state->ol_state.status !=
> - state->u.read.res.length);
> + WARN_ON(status < 0);
> + if (WARN_ON((pan_stor_len_t)status != state->u.read.res.length))
>
> Instead of casting status back to a pan_stor_len_t, couldn't you use res_p->length here?
res_p is actually &state->u.read.res.
we can just drop this...
Benny
>
> And, do you want to use WARN_ON here or wouldn't a simple test suffice?
>
> The same below.
>
> Thanx...
>
> ps
>
> + printk(KERN_ERR
> + "%s: status(0x%llx) != read.res.length(0x%llx)\n",
> + __func__, (u64)status,
> + (u64)state->u.read.res.length);
> } else {
> status = -panfs_export_ops->convert_rc(rc);
> dprintk("%s: pan_sam_read rc %d: status %Zd\n",
> @@ -499,9 +502,13 @@ panfs_shim_write_done(
> if (rc == PAN_SUCCESS) {
> state->ol_state.committed = NFS_FILE_SYNC;
> status = res_p->length;
> - BUG_ON(state->ol_state.status < 0);
> - BUG_ON((pan_stor_len_t)state->ol_state.status !=
> - state->u.write.res.length);
> + WARN_ON(status < 0);
> + if (WARN_ON((pan_stor_len_t)status != state->u.write.res.length))
> + printk(KERN_ERR
> + "%s: status(0x%llx) != write.res.length(0x%llx)\n",
> + __func__, (u64)status,
> + (u64)state->u.write.res.length);
> +
> objlayout_add_delta_space_used(&state->ol_state,
> res_p->delta_capacity_used);
> } else {
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-05-27 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-05-27 14:52 [PATCH] SQUASHME: pnfs-obj: panlayout: Fix very old BUG_ONs on ol_state.status Boaz Harrosh
2010-05-27 15:26 ` Staubach_Peter
[not found] ` <BF3BB6D12298F54B89C8DCC1E4073D80F2C566-1Zg0zMUlrbd9m/dOYFj4Yjjd7nCn89gW@public.gmane.org>
2010-05-27 16:31 ` Benny Halevy [this message]
2010-05-27 18:08 ` Benny Halevy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4BFE9E75.1020307@panasas.com \
--to=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=Staubach_Peter@emc.com \
--cc=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=osd-dev@open-osd.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).