From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>,
"Welch, Brent" <welch@panasas.com>
Cc: sfaibish <sfaibish@emc.com>, NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Performance results with exofs
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 08:26:45 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C0DD495.5070908@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100607184902.GI25257@fieldses.org>
On 06/07/2010 09:49 PM, J. Bruce Fields wrote:
>>
>> It's a know problem with a network storage cluster. What happens is
>> that with 8of8 all the clients exercise all of the nodes at the same
>> time so they are clashing on the network.
>
> OK, so if two clients are both trying to send a stripe of data to the
> same OSD data at the same time, absent a switch that could somehow
> afford to queue up a full stripe-unit's worth of data, packets get lost?
>
It's tcp they don't get lost, per-se they just get queued up. And that tcp
ramp up and all that, you know.
We use a 64k stripe unit with say raid of 4-8 that's 256k-1M bytes in a stripe.
I don't think a network buffer that big will help at all. It'll just delay
everything more. The best is a sound statistical network strategy that'll let
the system even out overall. (Or not ...)
> (Also, out of curiosity: do you know of any papers or documentation that
> describe that problem in more detail?)
>
Personally, I'm privileged to learn from the best here at Panasas.
CC: Brent, Can you recommend to Bruce some good papers about raid
groups and network SAN strategies?
> --b.
Boaz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-08 5:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <op.vdxrrgf1unckof@usensfaibisl2e.eng.emc.com>
2010-06-07 16:07 ` Performance results with exofs Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-07 16:13 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-07 17:28 ` sfaibish
[not found] ` <op.vdxxhfqsunckof-sXut7+96orlxdPWQvOaHCoI83tS8F2Zb0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-07 17:29 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-07 17:34 ` sfaibish
2010-06-07 18:29 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-06-07 18:41 ` Boaz Harrosh
2010-06-07 18:49 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-06-08 5:26 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2010-06-08 6:54 ` Benny Halevy
2010-06-08 14:48 ` sfaibish
[not found] ` <op.vdzkrtmqunckof-sXut7+96orlxdPWQvOaHCoI83tS8F2Zb0E9HWUfgJXw@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-08 23:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2010-06-07 18:43 ` Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C0DD495.5070908@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfaibish@emc.com \
--cc=welch@panasas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox