From: Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com>
To: andros@netapp.com, Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>,
NFS list <linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] SQUASHME pnfs-submit: move layoutcommit to nfs_write_inode
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 19:01:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C0E695A.6090801@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1275582327-9285-5-git-send-email-andros@netapp.com>
On 06/03/2010 07:25 PM, andros@netapp.com wrote:
> From: Andy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
>
> The LAYOUTCOMMIT call indicates an update to the file meta data is needed,
> and should be called when clearing the I_DIRTY_SYNC state.
>
> A call to LAYOUTCOMMIT in nfs_write_inode replaces the calls in nfs_wb_all,
> nfs_commit_inode, and __nfs4_close.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
This patch no longer applies on 2.6.35-rc2 in write.c at nfs_commit_inode.
But it was easy enough to fix. (Benny tell me if you want a tree with these
in)
So I did a rough test "git clone linux" and cthon. It looks very good
(few comments below)
> ---
> fs/nfs/nfs4state.c | 2 --
> fs/nfs/pnfs.h | 4 ++++
> fs/nfs/write.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
> index d0dbdd4..e1207fa 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4state.c
> @@ -589,8 +589,6 @@ static void __nfs4_close(struct path *path, struct nfs4_state *state, fmode_t fm
> #ifdef CONFIG_NFS_V4_1
> struct nfs_inode *nfsi = NFS_I(state->inode);
>
> - if (layoutcommit_needed(nfsi))
> - pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(state->inode, wait);
> if (has_layout(nfsi) && nfsi->layout.roc_iomode) {
> struct nfs4_pnfs_layout_segment range;
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> index c89be78..009393e 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.h
> @@ -256,6 +256,10 @@ static inline int pnfs_use_rpc(struct nfs_server *nfss)
> return 1;
> }
>
> +static inline int pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(struct inode *inode, int sync)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
> #endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */
>
Just for correctness this patch belongs to [patch 3/4], for it to
compile independently.
If they are all squashed then that does not matter. Just as a note.
You might as well combine them.
> #endif /* FS_NFS_PNFS_H */
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/write.c b/fs/nfs/write.c
> index 0fd33cb..513b308 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/write.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/write.c
> @@ -1489,13 +1489,6 @@ static int nfs_commit_inode(struct inode *inode, int how)
> wait_on_bit(&NFS_I(inode)->flags, NFS_INO_COMMIT,
> nfs_wait_bit_killable,
> TASK_KILLABLE);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NFS_V4_1
> - if (may_wait && layoutcommit_needed(NFS_I(inode))) {
> - error = pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(inode, 1);
> - if (error < 0)
> - return error;
> - }
> -#endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */
> } else
> nfs_commit_clear_lock(NFS_I(inode));
> out:
> @@ -1545,7 +1538,18 @@ static int nfs_commit_unstable_pages(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_contr
>
> int nfs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc)
> {
> - return nfs_commit_unstable_pages(inode, wbc);
> + int ret;
> + ret = nfs_commit_unstable_pages(inode, wbc);
> + if (ret >= 0 && layoutcommit_needed(NFS_I(inode))) {
> + int err, sync = wbc->sync_mode;
> +
> + if (wbc->nonblocking || wbc->for_background)
> + sync = 0;
> + err = pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(inode, sync);
> + if (err < 0)
> + ret = err;
> + }
> + return ret;
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1562,10 +1566,6 @@ int nfs_wb_all(struct inode *inode)
> };
>
> ret = sync_inode(inode, &wbc);
> -#ifdef CONFIG_NFS_V4_1
> - if (!ret && layoutcommit_needed(NFS_I(inode)))
> - ret = pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(inode, 1);
> -#endif
> return ret;
> }
>
Grate stuff.
Boaz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-08 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-03 16:25 [PATCH 0/4] pnfs-submit: cleanup layoutcommit verison 2 andros
2010-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH 1/4] SQUASHME pnfs-submit: cleanup layoutcommit call andros
2010-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH 2/4] SQUASHME pnfs-submit: handle async layoutcommit errors andros
2010-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH 3/4] SQUASHME pnfs remove ifdef around layoutcommit_needed andros
2010-06-03 16:25 ` [PATCH 4/4] SQUASHME pnfs-submit: move layoutcommit to nfs_write_inode andros
2010-06-08 16:01 ` Boaz Harrosh [this message]
2010-06-03 17:11 ` [PATCH 0/4] pnfs-submit: cleanup layoutcommit verison 2 Boaz Harrosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C0E695A.6090801@panasas.com \
--to=bharrosh@panasas.com \
--cc=andros@netapp.com \
--cc=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).