From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
To: "Murata, Dennis" <DENNIS.MURATA-jTGLxe6cr0Q@public.gmane.org>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: FW: Unable to mount nfs directories RHEL 4.8
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 18:33:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C1016AA.2030702@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <620E93B2E5CC3B46BD811165E3335B8708CB9D3B-9/h0XwadXgnyjpQT3Si/rsM9+qvyE0V4QQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
On 06/ 9/10 02:47 PM, Murata, Dennis wrote:
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chuck Lever [mailto:chuck.lever@oracle.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 11:18 AM
>> To: Murata, Dennis
>> Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
>> Subject: Re: FW: Unable to mount nfs directories RHEL 4.8
>>
>> On 06/ 8/10 08:05 PM, Murata, Dennis wrote:
>>> Didn't see the original message, sorry if this is a duplicate
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Murata, Dennis
>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 08, 2010 3:26 PM
>>> To: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org
>>> Subject: Unable to mount nfs directories RHEL 4.8
>>>
>>> We are using a modified RHEL 4.8 build accessing Netapp filers for
>>> data directories. The build has nfs-utils-1.0.6-93.EL4,
>>> nfs-utils-lib-1.0.6-10.el4, kernel-largesmp-2.6.9-89.EL all x86_64.
>>> After a period of use, on a very questionable network using
>> tcp as the
>>> nfs transport, workstation will start getting error messages in
>>> /var/log/messages|dmesg and are not able to mount/access the data
>>> directories. A reboot is necessary to allow the mounts. The time
>>> period varies and seems to depend on the usage, but in general will
>>> start within a week of moderate use. The error messages are:
>>>
>>> lockd: cannot monitor 192.168.10.133
>>> lockd: failed to monitor 192.168.10.133
>>> nsm_mon_unmon: rpc failed, status=-96
>>> lockd: cannot monitor 192.168.10.133
>>> lockd: failed to monitor 192.168.10.133
>>> nsm_mon_unmon: rpc failed, status=-96
>>> lockd: cannot monitor 192.168.10.133
>>> lockd: failed to monitor 192.168.10.133
These are all from the kernel, specifically lockd. They are reported
when lockd can't perform the upcall (via loopback) to rpc.statd to
monitor 192.168.10.133.
status -96 means the server (both portmap and rpc.statd are on the local
host in this case) doesn't support the requested program version (either
rpcbind v2 or statd v1).
You might get more information by enabling RPC debugging messages on
clients in this state.
# sudo rpcdebug -m rpc -s all
This will cause a lot of traffic in the syslog, so only do it once the
host is wedged, but still trying to do work. We want to capture
debugging output during at least one iteration of the messages above.
There are Red Hat NFS engineers on this list who can help you if you can
reproduce this with stock RHEL 4.8.
>>> These errors are repeated as access to the filer (ip
>> address has been
>>> changed) is tried. A ps on the workstation shows rpc.statd still
>>> running, service nfslock status reports rpc.statd running.
>>
>> Is portmap running, and is the statd service registered? Is
>> lockd registered for both UDP and TCP?
> Portmap is running. Not sure how to check if lockd is registered but
> the output from rpcinfo -p
> [root@host1 ~]# rpcinfo -p
> program vers proto port
> 100000 2 tcp 111 portmapper
> 100000 2 udp 111 portmapper
> 100007 2 udp 880 ypbind
> 100007 1 udp 880 ypbind
> 100007 2 tcp 883 ypbind
> 100007 1 tcp 883 ypbind
> 100011 1 udp 948 rquotad
> 100011 2 udp 948 rquotad
> 100011 1 tcp 963 rquotad
> 100011 2 tcp 963 rquotad
> 100003 2 udp 2049 nfs
> 100003 3 udp 2049 nfs
> 100003 4 udp 2049 nfs
> 100003 2 tcp 2049 nfs
> 100003 3 tcp 2049 nfs
> 100003 4 tcp 2049 nfs
> 100021 1 udp 34574 nlockmgr
> 100021 3 udp 34574 nlockmgr
> 100021 4 udp 34574 nlockmgr
> 100021 1 tcp 32786 nlockmgr
> 100021 3 tcp 32786 nlockmgr
> 100021 4 tcp 32786 nlockmgr
> 100005 1 udp 962 mountd
> 100005 1 tcp 974 mountd
> 100005 2 udp 962 mountd
> 100005 2 tcp 974 mountd
> 100005 3 udp 962 mountd
> 100005 3 tcp 974 mountd
> 100024 1 udp 744 status
> 100024 1 tcp 750 status
> [root@host1 ~]#
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-09 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-09 0:05 FW: Unable to mount nfs directories RHEL 4.8 Murata, Dennis
[not found] ` <620E93B2E5CC3B46BD811165E3335B8708C2A04E-9/h0XwadXgnyjpQT3Si/rsM9+qvyE0V4QQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-09 16:18 ` Chuck Lever
2010-06-09 18:47 ` Murata, Dennis
[not found] ` <620E93B2E5CC3B46BD811165E3335B8708CB9D3B-9/h0XwadXgnyjpQT3Si/rsM9+qvyE0V4QQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org>
2010-06-09 22:33 ` Chuck Lever [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C1016AA.2030702@oracle.com \
--to=chuck.lever@oracle.com \
--cc=DENNIS.MURATA-jTGLxe6cr0Q@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox