From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pNFS timeouts
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:10:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C16467D.2030000@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100614150542.GD17703@ics.muni.cz>
On Jun. 14, 2010, 11:05 -0400, Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@ics.muni.cz> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 10:46:55AM -0400, Benny Halevy wrote:
>>> Jun 14 16:17:00 undomiel1 kernel: [187434.936507] nfs41_sequence_call_done rpc_cred ffff88003d7a0300
>>> Jun 14 16:17:00 undomiel1 kernel: [187434.936514] <-- nfs41_sequence_call_done
>>> Jun 14 16:17:00 undomiel1 kernel: [187434.936522] nfs4_schedule_state_renewal: requeueing work. Lease period = 60
>>> Jun 14 16:17:00 undomiel1 kernel: [187434.936530] --> nfs_put_client({2})
>>> Jun 14 16:17:16 undomiel1 kernel: [187450.536014] nfs4_renew_state: start
>>> Jun 14 16:17:16 undomiel1 kernel: [187450.536045] nfs4_renew_state: failed to call renewd. Reason: lease not expired
>>> Jun 14 16:17:16 undomiel1 kernel: [187450.536056] nfs4_schedule_state_renewal: requeueing work. Lease period = 38
>>
>> This looks like a complaint but it's actually saying that the "failure"
>> is due to the fact that everything is OK (lease not expired)
>
> the state renewal actually starts after 16 seconds after schedule start
> renewal for some reason. The nfs_put_client actually starts the renewal?
>
No, the state renewal is done independently in the background.
>> BTW, is this the same issue that Jiri reported?
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-nfs&m=127619696004097&w=2
>
> Yes, but I didn't see any response to that, so I guess his report is not clear
> enough.
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-14 15:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-14 8:51 pNFS timeouts Lukas Hejtmanek
2010-06-14 14:11 ` Benny Halevy
2010-06-14 14:23 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2010-06-14 14:46 ` Benny Halevy
2010-06-14 15:02 ` Benny Halevy
2010-06-14 15:12 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2010-06-14 15:05 ` Lukas Hejtmanek
2010-06-14 15:10 ` Benny Halevy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C16467D.2030000@panasas.com \
--to=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=bfields@fieldses.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xhejtman@ics.muni.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox