From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@panasas.com>
To: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] pnfs-submit: Remove lo_lock and use i_lock instead
Date: Tue, 15 Jun 2010 17:06:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4C17EB46.5010701@panasas.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276588792-9212-1-git-send-email-iisaman@netapp.com>
On 2010-06-15 03:59, Fred Isaman wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Fred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
Thanks!
I queued it in pnfs-submit.
Should go out in the next batch.
Benny
> ---
> fs/nfs/inode.c | 2 +-
> fs/nfs/pnfs.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> include/linux/nfs_fs.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/inode.c b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> index cdec539..e51f882 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/inode.c
> @@ -1417,7 +1417,7 @@ static void pnfs_init_once(struct nfs_inode *nfsi)
> {
> #ifdef CONFIG_NFS_V4_1
> init_waitqueue_head(&nfsi->lo_waitq);
> - spin_lock_init(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_lock_init(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
> seqlock_init(&nfsi->layout.seqlock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfsi->layout.lo_layouts);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfsi->layout.segs);
> diff --git a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> index 7d322c9..4afa4cf 100644
> --- a/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> +++ b/fs/nfs/pnfs.c
> @@ -152,15 +152,15 @@ void
> pnfs_need_layoutcommit(struct nfs_inode *nfsi, struct nfs_open_context *ctx)
> {
> dprintk("%s: has_layout=%d ctx=%p\n", __func__, has_layout(nfsi), ctx);
> - spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_lock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
> if (has_layout(nfsi) && !layoutcommit_needed(nfsi)) {
> nfsi->layout.lo_cred = get_rpccred(ctx->state->owner->so_cred);
> nfsi->change_attr++;
> - spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
> dprintk("%s: Set layoutcommit\n", __func__);
> return;
> }
> - spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
> }
>
> /* Update last_write_offset for layoutcommit.
> @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ pnfs_update_last_write(struct nfs_inode *nfsi, loff_t offset, size_t extent)
> {
> loff_t end_pos;
>
> - spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_lock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
> if (offset < nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_begin_pos)
> nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_begin_pos = offset;
> end_pos = offset + extent - 1; /* I'm being inclusive */
> @@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ pnfs_update_last_write(struct nfs_inode *nfsi, loff_t offset, size_t extent)
> (unsigned long) offset ,
> (unsigned long) nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_begin_pos,
> (unsigned long) nfsi->layout.pnfs_write_end_pos);
> - spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
> }
>
> /* Unitialize a mountpoint in a layout driver */
> @@ -315,7 +315,7 @@ pnfs_unregister_layoutdriver(struct pnfs_layoutdriver_type *ld_type)
> */
> #if defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> #define BUG_ON_UNLOCKED_LO(lo) \
> - BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&PNFS_NFS_INODE(lo)->lo_lock))
> + BUG_ON(!spin_is_locked(&PNFS_INODE(lo)->i_lock))
> #else /* CONFIG_SMP */
> #define BUG_ON_UNLOCKED_LO(lo) do {} while (0)
> #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> @@ -329,9 +329,9 @@ get_lock_current_layout(struct nfs_inode *nfsi)
> struct pnfs_layout_type *lo;
>
> lo = &nfsi->layout;
> - spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_lock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
> if (!lo->ld_data) {
> - spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
> return NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -345,7 +345,7 @@ get_lock_current_layout(struct nfs_inode *nfsi)
> static inline void
> put_unlock_current_layout(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo)
> {
> - struct nfs_inode *nfsi = PNFS_NFS_INODE(lo);
> + struct inode *inode = PNFS_INODE(lo);
> struct nfs_client *clp;
>
> BUG_ON_UNLOCKED_LO(lo);
> @@ -360,12 +360,12 @@ put_unlock_current_layout(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo)
> lo->ld_data = NULL;
>
> /* Unlist the layout. */
> - clp = NFS_SERVER(&nfsi->vfs_inode)->nfs_client;
> + clp = NFS_SERVER(inode)->nfs_client;
> spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> list_del_init(&lo->lo_layouts);
> spin_unlock(&clp->cl_lock);
> }
> - spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> }
>
> void
> @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ pnfs_layout_release(struct pnfs_layout_type *lo,
> {
> struct nfs_inode *nfsi = PNFS_NFS_INODE(lo);
>
> - spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_lock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
> if (range)
> pnfs_free_layout(lo, range);
> put_unlock_current_layout(lo);
> @@ -446,9 +446,9 @@ put_lseg(struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg)
> atomic_read(&lseg->kref.refcount), lseg->valid);
> do_wake_up = !lseg->valid;
> nfsi = PNFS_NFS_INODE(lseg->layout);
> - spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_lock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
> kref_put(&lseg->kref, destroy_lseg);
> - spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
> if (do_wake_up)
> wake_up(&nfsi->lo_waitq);
> }
> @@ -686,7 +686,7 @@ pnfs_return_layout_barrier(struct nfs_inode *nfsi,
> struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg;
> bool ret = false;
>
> - spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_lock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
> list_for_each_entry (lseg, &nfsi->layout.segs, fi_list) {
> if (!should_free_lseg(lseg, range))
> continue;
> @@ -698,7 +698,7 @@ pnfs_return_layout_barrier(struct nfs_inode *nfsi,
> ret = true;
> }
> }
> - spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&nfsi->vfs_inode.i_lock);
> dprintk("%s:Return %d\n", __func__, ret);
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -772,12 +772,12 @@ _pnfs_return_layout(struct inode *ino, struct nfs4_pnfs_layout_segment *range,
> /* unlock w/o put rebalanced by eventual call to
> * pnfs_layout_release
> */
> - spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
>
> if (pnfs_return_layout_barrier(nfsi, &arg)) {
> if (stateid) { /* callback */
> status = -EAGAIN;
> - spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_lock(&ino->i_lock);
> put_unlock_current_layout(lo);
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -922,7 +922,7 @@ static int pnfs_wait_schedule(void *word)
> /*
> * get, possibly allocate, and lock current_layout
> *
> - * Note: If successful, nfsi->lo_lock is taken and the caller
> + * Note: If successful, ino->i_lock is taken and the caller
> * must put and unlock current_layout by using put_unlock_current_layout()
> * when the returned layout is released.
> */
> @@ -959,7 +959,7 @@ get_lock_alloc_layout(struct inode *ino)
> struct nfs_client *clp = NFS_SERVER(ino)->nfs_client;
>
> /* must grab the layout lock before the client lock */
> - spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_lock(&ino->i_lock);
>
> spin_lock(&clp->cl_lock);
> if (list_empty(&lo->lo_layouts))
> @@ -1111,7 +1111,7 @@ _pnfs_update_layout(struct inode *ino,
> }
>
> /* Lose lock, but not reference, match this with pnfs_layout_release */
> - spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
>
> get_layout(ino, ctx, &arg, lsegpp, lo);
> out:
> @@ -1235,7 +1235,7 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_pnfs_layoutget *lgp)
> struct pnfs_layout_type *lo = lgp->lo;
> struct nfs4_pnfs_layoutget_res *res = &lgp->res;
> struct pnfs_layout_segment *lseg;
> - struct nfs_inode *nfsi = PNFS_NFS_INODE(lo);
> + struct inode *ino = PNFS_INODE(lo);
> int status = 0;
>
> /* Inject layout blob into I/O device driver */
> @@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_pnfs_layoutget *lgp)
> *lgp->lsegpp = lseg;
> }
>
> - spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_lock(&ino->i_lock);
> pnfs_insert_layout(lo, lseg);
>
> if (res->return_on_close) {
> @@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ pnfs_layout_process(struct nfs4_pnfs_layoutget *lgp)
>
> /* Done processing layoutget. Set the layout stateid */
> pnfs_set_layout_stateid(lo, &res->stateid);
> - spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&ino->i_lock);
> out:
> return status;
> }
> @@ -1785,9 +1785,9 @@ pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(struct inode *inode, int sync)
> if (!data)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> - spin_lock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
> if (!layoutcommit_needed(nfsi)) {
> - spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
> goto out_free;
> }
>
> @@ -1802,7 +1802,7 @@ pnfs_layoutcommit_inode(struct inode *inode, int sync)
> nfsi->layout.lo_cred = NULL;
> pnfs_get_layout_stateid(&data->args.stateid, &nfsi->layout);
>
> - spin_unlock(&nfsi->lo_lock);
> + spin_unlock(&inode->i_lock);
>
> /* Set up layout commit args */
> status = pnfs_layoutcommit_setup(inode, data, write_begin_pos,
> diff --git a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> index 41026cb..a60d880 100644
> --- a/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/nfs_fs.h
> @@ -206,7 +206,6 @@ struct nfs_inode {
> /* pNFS layout information */
> #if defined(CONFIG_NFS_V4_1)
> wait_queue_head_t lo_waitq;
> - spinlock_t lo_lock;
> struct pnfs_layout_type layout;
> #endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_1 */
> #endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4*/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-15 21:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-15 7:59 [PATCH 1/1] pnfs-submit: Remove lo_lock and use i_lock instead Fred Isaman
2010-06-15 21:06 ` Benny Halevy [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4C17EB46.5010701@panasas.com \
--to=bhalevy@panasas.com \
--cc=iisaman@netapp.com \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox